Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. KUHS, 224 P.3d 192.

81 citing documents.

State v. Leeds Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“Police generally have no duty to seek out and obtain potentially exculpatory evidence.”) (citation omitted); ¶ 24, (appellate court reviews sufficiency of the evidence by determining whether jury’s findings are supported by substantial evidence; that is, evidence that is adequate to support a reasonable person’s conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt); State v. Henry, 205 Ari
State of Arizona v. Andre Michael Leteve 354 P.3d 393 Ariz. 2015
State of Arizona v. Andre Michael Leteve 354 P.3d 393 Ariz. 2015
State v. Guinard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Guinard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“Police generally have no duty to seek out and obtain potentially exculpatory evidence.” (citation omitted)); ¶ 24, (appellate court reviews sufficiency of the evidence by determining whether jury’s findings are supported by substantial evidence; that is, evidence that is adequate to support a reasonable person’s conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt); State v. Henry, 205 Ari
State of Arizona v. Johnathan Ian Burns 344 P.3d 303 Ariz. 2015
State of Arizona v. Johnathan Ian Burns 344 P.3d 303 Ariz. 2015
State v. Tarr 331 P.3d 423 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Tarr 331 P.3d 423 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 42, (“We review a trial court’s response to jurors for an abuse of discretion.”).
State v. Loff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Loff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 24, (alteration in original) (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
State of Arizona v. Shawna Forde 315 P.3d 1200 Ariz. 2014
State of Arizona v. Shawna Forde 315 P.3d 1200 Ariz. 2014
We have repeatedly rejected this argument, ¶ 23 n.4, n.4 (2010), and Forde offers no reasons to reconsider these decisions.
State of Arizona v. Eric Boyston 298 P.3d 887 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. Eric Boyston 298 P.3d 887 Ariz. 2013
Timothy “had ample opportunity not only to feel pain, but also to contemplate his impending death.” ¶ 62
State of Arizona v. Manuel Ovante, Jr. 291 P.3d 974 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. Manuel Ovante, Jr. 291 P.3d 974 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn Hausner 280 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2012
State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn Hausner 280 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2012
-87 ¶¶ 51-56, -03 (2010).
State v. Cota 272 P.3d 1027 Ariz. 2012
State v. Cota 272 P.3d 1027 Ariz. 2012
State of Arizona v. Jahmari Ali Manuel 270 P.3d 828 Ariz. 2011
State of Arizona v. Jahmari Ali Manuel 270 P.3d 828 Ariz. 2011
State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
“Reversal is not required if a fair and impartial jury was ultimately empanelled.” Garza, 163 P.3d at 1015
State v. Lynch 234 P.3d 595 Ariz. 2010
State v. Lynch 234 P.3d 595 Ariz. 2010
See State v. Kuhs, 223 Ariz. 376, 380 ¶ 16
State of Arizona v. Louie Thomas MacHado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. Louie Thomas MacHado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
(presuming jurors follow court‟s instructions).