Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Peek, 195 P.3d 641.

90 citing documents.

State v. Parker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Parker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
P. 32.4(a); ¶¶ 12–13 (2009) (other than claims excepted under Rule 32.2(b), post- conviction claim is waived if not timely raised); ¶ 4 (2008) (same).
State of Arizona v. Usef Latrice Simmons II 363 P.3d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Usef Latrice Simmons II 363 P.3d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State v. Caratachea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Caratachea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle 358 P.3d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle 358 P.3d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State v. Greathouse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Greathouse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
DBT Yuma, L.L.C. v. Yuma County Airport Authority 340 P.3d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
DBT Yuma, L.L.C. v. Yuma County Airport Authority 340 P.3d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Anthony Lewis 340 P.3d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Anthony Lewis 340 P.3d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
(“When the legislature intends to include attempts, it knows how to do so.”).
Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of Arizona 332 P.3d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of Arizona 332 P.3d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
(concluding fine mandated by § 13-3408(E) not applicable to those convicted of attempt); , (citing Wise with approval).
State v. Doty 307 P.3d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Doty 307 P.3d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Gray 258 P.3d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Gray 258 P.3d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
“When the legislature intends to include attempts, it knows how to do so.” , (1993 amendment to AR.S.
State v. Glassel 248 P.3d 217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Glassel 248 P.3d 217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Abdi 248 P.3d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Abdi 248 P.3d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Dean 243 P.3d 1029 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Dean 243 P.3d 1029 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State of Arizona v. Paul David Windsor, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. Paul David Windsor, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
¶¶ 16-17, -44 (2008) (rejecting argument based on case law requiring interpretation contrary to statute‟s plain language).
State v. Henry 228 P.3d 900 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State v. Henry 228 P.3d 900 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Laws, ch. 201, § 242; , ¶¶ 15-17
Industrial Commission v. Old Republic Insurance 219 P.3d 285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Industrial Commission v. Old Republic Insurance 219 P.3d 285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Rogers v. Cota 219 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Rogers v. Cota 219 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Hardesty 214 P.3d 1004 Ariz. 2009
State v. Hardesty 214 P.3d 1004 Ariz. 2009
-84, ¶¶ 6, 11, -43 (2008).
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Duncan 216 P.3d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Duncan 216 P.3d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Shrum 203 P.3d 1175 Ariz. 2009
State v. Shrum 203 P.3d 1175 Ariz. 2009
¶ 4, (noting that State may waive preclusion).