Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Regenold, 249 P.3d 337.

28 citing documents.

State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Palmares Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Palmares Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Bustos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Bustos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Woydziak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Woydziak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
–80, ¶¶ 8, 10 2 STATE v. WOYDZIAK Decision of the Court (2011).
State of Arizona v. Demitres Robertson 468 P.3d 1217 Ariz. 2020
State of Arizona v. Demitres Robertson 468 P.3d 1217 Ariz. 2020
The court of appeals’ and misapplies the invited error doctrine.
State v. De Groote Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. De Groote Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
A.R.S § 13-4033(B); ¶ 1 (2011); ¶ 9 (App. 2010).
State v. Burney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Burney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 12 (2011) (holding a defendant may appeal a sentence imposed after a contested hearing on a probation violation).
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Young timely appealed and we have jurisdiction pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-4033 380, ¶¶ 1, 12 (2011) (“a defendant who pleads guilty but later contests an alleged probation violation may appeal the resulting sentence”).
State v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶8 (2011) (sentence imposed in contested probation revocation proceeding is not entered pursuant to underlying plea agreement); ¶ 15 (App. 2003) (court of appeals may not overrule, modify or disregard decisions of Arizona Supreme Court).
State v. Nash Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Nash Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 12 (2010) (determining A.R.S.
State v. Sarno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Sarno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
§ 13-4033(B) (2014) ("In noncapital cases a defendant may not appeal from a judgment or sentence that is entered pursuant to a plea agreement or an admission to a probation violation."); ¶ 1
Frank Hoffman v. Hon. chandler/state 295 P.3d 939 Ariz. 2013
Frank Hoffman v. Hon. chandler/state 295 P.3d 939 Ariz. 2013
¶ 5, (“[Rule] 32.1 provides the review process for defendants who plead guilty.”).
State v. Regenold 255 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Regenold 255 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by