Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Robert Hernandez, 305 P.3d 378.

67 citing documents.

State v. Ortiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 53 (2013) (citations omitted).6 ¶15 As outlined above, see supra ¶¶ 10-12, a reasonable fact-finder could have inferred that Appellant intentionally aided or assisted in killing Flaco and his men, even if his sole motivation for doing so was duress.
State of Arizona v. Demirus Ananda Koepke 377 P.3d 385 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Demirus Ananda Koepke 377 P.3d 385 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Mark Goudeau 372 P.3d 945 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Mark Goudeau 372 P.3d 945 Ariz. 2016
State v. Younan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Younan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
5 STATE v. YOUNAN Decision of the Court and pervasive conflict with his attorney or evidence that he had such minimal contact with the attorney that meaningful communication was not possible.” ¶ 15 (2013).
State v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Trejo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Trejo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 15 (2013) (quotation omitted).
State v. Ross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Ross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. 2 ¶ 15, 305 P.3d at 378, 383 (2013) (internal punctuation and citations omitted).
State v. Jarrett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Jarrett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
103(a)(2) (requiring a party to make an offer of proof at trial in order to challenge a trial court’s order precluding evidence); ¶ 37
State v. Craft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Craft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014