Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gipson, 277 P.3d 189.
-
State of Arizona v. Eslyn Adrian Villa
335 P.3d 1142
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
P., requires the trial court to submit forms of verdict to the jury “for all offenses necessarily included in the offense charged.” ¶¶ 14, 17, -92 (2012) (not error for court to instruct on lesser-included offenses supported by evidence over party’s objection).
- State v. Jarrett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Jarrett
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Vanderlinden, 111 Ariz. at 379-80, 530 P.2d at 1108-09; ¶ 13, (explaining former requirement that trial courts instruct on every lesser- included offense supported by the evidence was “abandoned through an amendment to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 21.3(c).”); (“A defe
- State of Arizona v. Anthony Connue Serrano 323 P.3d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
-
State of Arizona v. Anthony Connue Serrano
323 P.3d 774
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
See, (preparation of new pre-sentence report); (postponement of sentencing for competency examination); (severance, continuance, or mistrial); (noting adversary system permits counsel to choose tactics).