Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gipson, 277 P.3d 189.

55 citing documents.

  • State of Arizona v. Eslyn Adrian Villa 335 P.3d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
    P., requires the trial court to submit forms of verdict to the jury “for all offenses necessarily included in the offense charged.” ¶¶ 14, 17, -92 (2012) (not error for court to instruct on lesser-included offenses supported by evidence over party’s objection).
  • State v. Jarrett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Jarrett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    Vanderlinden, 111 Ariz. at 379-80, 530 P.2d at 1108-09; ¶ 13, (explaining former requirement that trial courts instruct on every lesser- included offense supported by the evidence was “abandoned through an amendment to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 21.3(c).”); (“A defe
  • State of Arizona v. Anthony Connue Serrano 323 P.3d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
  • State of Arizona v. Anthony Connue Serrano 323 P.3d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
    See, (preparation of new pre-sentence report); (postponement of sentencing for competency examination); (severance, continuance, or mistrial); (noting adversary system permits counsel to choose tactics).