Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Phil Gutierrez, 278 P.3d 1276.

1732 citing documents.

State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Manganiello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Manganiello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Andrich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Avitia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Olivarez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Webb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Gary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Le Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. O'Brien Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Clarke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Olivarez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. O'Brien Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Clarke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Webb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Gary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Avitia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Le Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Osorio-Rosas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Arias-Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Arias-Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Osorio-Rosas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶5 In a post-conviction relief proceeding, the purpose of an evidentiary hearing is to allow the superior court “to receive evidence, make factual determinations, and resolve material issues of fact.” ¶ 31 (2012).
State v. Burks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Thrasher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Gomez-Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Gomez-Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Burks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Thrasher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Petrone Cabanas v. Hon. pineda/state 433 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Petrone Cabanas v. Hon. pineda/state 433 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Rule 32.3(a) (discussing the nature of a post-conviction relief proceeding and its relation to other remedies); ¶ 32 (2012) (“Rule 32.8(a) provide[s] for an evidentiary hearing only to determine issues of material fact.”).
State v. Tull Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Garza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Noble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Noble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Garza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Tull Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Beyers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Beyers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Malmin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Malmin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by