Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Phil Gutierrez, 278 P.3d 1276.

1755 citing documents.

State v. Cooper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Briseno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Briseno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wiggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wiggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ventura Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ventura Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 19 (2012) (appellate court reviews denial of petition for post-conviction relief for abuse of discretion) (citation omitted).
State v. Salem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Salem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cicogni Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cicogni Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶7 “The purpose of an evidentiary hearing in the Rule 32 context is to allow the court to receive evidence, make factual determinations, and resolve material issues of fact.” ¶ 31 (2012).
State v. Skala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Skala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hazzard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hazzard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Salerno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Salerno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶5 “The purpose of an evidentiary hearing in the Rule 32 context is to allow the court to receive evidence, make factual determinations, and resolve material issues of fact.” ¶ 31, 2 STATE v. SALERNO Decision of the Court (citations omitted).
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sullivan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sullivan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sovero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sovero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Leon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Leon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Peterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Peterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Stafford v. Burns 389 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Stafford v. Burns 389 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 4 (2014) ( ¶ 19 (2012)); ¶¶ 9-10 (App. 2010).
State v. Alvarado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Alvarado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Boyce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Boyce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Laird Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Laird Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“The purpose of an evidentiary hearing in the Rule 32 context is to allow the court to receive evidence, make factual determinations, and resolve material issues of fact.” ¶ 31, (citations omitted).
State v. Branch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Branch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Endreson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Endreson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Pieck Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Pieck Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“The purpose of an evidentiary hearing in the Rule 32 context is to allow the court to receive evidence, make factual determinations, and resolve material issues of fact.” ¶ 31 (2012).
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by