Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Mark Goudeau, 372 P.3d 945.

208 citing documents.

State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
P. 13.4(c) (explaining a defendant must renew a motion to sever offenses “during trial at or before the close of the evidence” or “[s]everance is waived”); ¶ 54 (2016) ().
State v. Gutierrez 381 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Arizona v. Aaron Brian Gunches 377 P.3d 993 Ariz. 2016
State v. Gutierrez 381 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Arizona v. Aaron Brian Gunches 377 P.3d 993 Ariz. 2016
¶17 “A defendant may waive mitigation if he is competent and makes the decision knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.” ¶ 116, ¶ 240
State v. Barlow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Barlow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Biggers, 409 U.S. at 199-200; Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 114 (1977); (reciting the Biggers factors as those to “be examined in determining reliability” of a suggestive identification); ¶ 132 (2016) (same); (requiring an identification instruction upon request when court has found pretrial procedure was unduly suggestive, but proposed in-court identification was nevertheless reliable); State Bar of Arizona, RAJI Std.