Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Armando Pena, Jr., 331 P.3d 412.
- State v. Ping Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- State v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- State v. Ping Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Meyer v. State 436 P.3d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Meyer v. State
436 P.3d 511
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Black’s Law Dictionary 343 (10th ed. 2014) (“Compensation consists of wages and benefits in return for services” and “includes wages, stock option plans, profit-sharing, commissions, bonuses, golden parachutes, vacation, sick pay, medical benefits, disability, leaves of absence, and expense reimbursement.” (citation omitted)); ¶ 6 (2014) (“Absent statutory definitions, courts .
- State v. Duarte 438 P.3d 707 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
-
State v. Duarte
438 P.3d 707
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
nsider the language of the statute, State v. Derello , , ¶ 21, giving "every word and phrase its 'usual and commonly understood meaning unless the legislature clearly intended a different meaning,' " State v. Randles , , ¶ 8, (quoting Bilke v. State , , ¶ 11, ); see also State v. Pena , , ¶ 6, (we may look to dictionaries for common meanings).
- State v. Ramos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Ramos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Dutra 426 P.3d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Dutra 426 P.3d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State of Arizona v. Lynn Lavern Burbey Ariz. 2017
- State of Arizona v. Lynn Lavern Burbey Ariz. 2017
- David Stambaugh v. Mark Killian 398 P.3d 574 Ariz. 2017
- David Stambaugh v. Mark Killian 398 P.3d 574 Ariz. 2017
- State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- State v. Decker 365 P.3d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
State v. Decker
365 P.3d 954
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Montgomery v. Harris (Shilgevorkyan), ¶ 8 (2014); ¶ 6 (2014); see also A.R.S.
- State of Arizona v. Usef Latrice Simmons II 363 P.3d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
-
State of Arizona v. Usef Latrice Simmons II
363 P.3d 120
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
When terms are not specifically defined, “courts apply common meanings and may look to dictionaries.” (internal citation omitted); see also § 1-213.
- State v. Stiefel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Stiefel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Fleming v. State Department of Public Safety 352 P.3d 446 Ariz. 2015
-
Fleming v. State Department of Public Safety
352 P.3d 446
Ariz. 2015
¶13 Neither § 12-820.02 nor § 12-820 (“Definitions”) defines the word “driver.” The court of appeals therefore appropriately consulted a dictionary defining “driver” as “[o]ne that drives, as the operator of a motor vehicle.” Fleming, 236 Ariz. at 213 ¶ 12, 337 P.3d at 1195 (alteration in original) (quoting The American Heritage Dictionary 548 (5th ed. 2011)); ¶ 6, (“Absent statutory definitions, courts apply common meanings and may look to dictionaries.” (citations omitted)).
- State v. Harrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Harrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State of Arizona v. Anthony Lewis 340 P.3d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
-
State of Arizona v. Anthony Lewis
340 P.3d 415
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
“Absent statutory definitions, courts apply common meanings and may look to dictionaries.” (internal citation omitted).