Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Glissendorf, 329 P.3d 1049.
-
State v. Featherston
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶9 The Arizona Supreme Court has established that “if the state fails to preserve evidence that is potentially exonerating, the accused might be entitled to an instruction informing the jury that it might draw an adverse inference from the state’s action.” ¶ 1, (citing Willits, 96 Ariz. at 191, 393 P.2d at 279).
- State v. Bermudez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Bermudez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
A Willits instruction is appropriate if the defendant proves that “(1) the state failed to preserve material and reasonably accessible evidence that could have had a tendency to exonerate the accused, and (2) there was resulting prejudice.” ¶ 8
- State v. Cravets Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014