Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Travis Wade Amaral, 368 P.3d 925.

182 citing documents.

State v. Leininger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cloud Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cloud Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Criticized State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Peralta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Peralta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Salerno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Salerno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-20, ¶¶ 10-11, -28 (2016).
State of Arizona v. Abel Daniel Hidalgo 390 P.3d 783 Ariz. 2017
State of Arizona v. Abel Daniel Hidalgo 390 P.3d 783 Ariz. 2017
–26 ¶ 29, –02 (2012) (finding that trial courts need not hold an evidentiary hearing on motion for new counsel where “there is no indication that a hearing would elicit additional facts beyond those already before the court”); ¶ 9, 220 ¶ 11, 928 (2016) (noting that a post- conviction relief petitioner is entitled to a hearing “if he or she presents a 3 STATE V. HIDALGO Opinion of the Court ‘colorable claim[,]’” i.e., i
State v. Crockett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Crockett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“The relevant inquiry for determining whether the petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing is whether he has alleged facts which, if true, would probably have changed the verdict or sentence.” ¶ 11
State of Arizona v. valencia/healer 386 P.3d 392 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. valencia/healer 386 P.3d 392 Ariz. 2016
P. 32.8(a) (“The defendant shall be entitled to a hearing to determine issues of material fact[.]”); , 220 ¶¶ 11-12, (discussing when an evidentiary hearing is required).
State v. Laird Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Laird Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 9, 3 ¶4 In Graham, the United States Supreme Court held the U.S. Constitution prohibits a sentence of life without the possibility of release for a juvenile who commits an offense other than homicide.
State v. Nouan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Nouan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. McDaniel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. McDaniel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Finley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Finley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 9 (2016); ¶ 17 (2006).
State v. Bautista Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Bautista Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 9, (appellate court reviews superior court’s summary dismissal of a Rule 32 proceeding for abuse of discretion).
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Lee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Lee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Arizona v. Knute Eckhard Kolmann 367 P.3d 61 Ariz. 2016