Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Darrel Peter Pandeli, 394 P.3d 2.
- Haley W., Gary W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Haley W., Gary W. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
that, under the circumstances, the challenged action might be considered sound trial strategy.” ¶ 7 (2017) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689).
- State v. Wollenberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
State v. Wollenberg
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
This court is not required to consider both prongs of the Strickland test “if the defendant makes an insufficient showing on one.” ¶ 6 (2017).
- State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Lowe
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
A reviewing court cannot simply second-guess defense counsel’s strategic decisions and “must be very cautious in deeming trial counsel’s assistance ineffective.” ¶¶ 7-8 (2017).
- State v. Wood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Wood
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
An abuse of discretion occurs “if the PCR court makes an error of law or fails to adequately investigate the facts necessary to support its decision.” ¶ 4 (2017).
- State v. Smith 422 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
-
State v. Smith
422 P.3d 586
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Pandeli , , ¶ 4, , 7 (2017), quoting Denz , , ¶ 6, 306 P.3d at 100 -01 .
- State of Arizona v. Kevin Artice Miles 414 P.3d 680 Ariz. 2018
- State of Arizona v. Kevin Artice Miles 414 P.3d 680 Ariz. 2018
- State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Fernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Wyatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Fernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
State v. Wyatt
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“In short, reviewing courts must be very cautious in deeming trial counsel’s assistance ineffective when counsel’s challenged acts or omissions might have a reasonable explanation.” ¶ 7
- State v. Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
State v. Valdez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
__, ¶ 33 (2017) (“Counsel’s failure to make a futile motion does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.”) (citation omitted).