Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Darrel Peter Pandeli, 394 P.3d 2.

220 citing documents.

  • Haley W., Gary W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Haley W., Gary W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    that, under the circumstances, the challenged action might be considered sound trial strategy.” ¶ 7 (2017) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689).
  • State v. Wollenberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Wollenberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    This court is not required to consider both prongs of the Strickland test “if the defendant makes an insufficient showing on one.” ¶ 6 (2017).
  • State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    A reviewing court cannot simply second-guess defense counsel’s strategic decisions and “must be very cautious in deeming trial counsel’s assistance ineffective.” ¶¶ 7-8 (2017).
  • State v. Wood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Wood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    An abuse of discretion occurs “if the PCR court makes an error of law or fails to adequately investigate the facts necessary to support its decision.” ¶ 4 (2017).
  • State v. Smith 422 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
  • State v. Smith 422 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
    State v. Pandeli , , ¶ 4, , 7 (2017), quoting Denz , , ¶ 6, 306 P.3d at 100 -01 .
  • State of Arizona v. Kevin Artice Miles 414 P.3d 680 Ariz. 2018
  • State of Arizona v. Kevin Artice Miles 414 P.3d 680 Ariz. 2018
  • State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Fernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Wyatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Fernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Wyatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    “In short, reviewing courts must be very cautious in deeming trial counsel’s assistance ineffective when counsel’s challenged acts or omissions might have a reasonable explanation.” ¶ 7
  • State v. Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    __, ¶ 33 (2017) (“Counsel’s failure to make a futile motion does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.”) (citation omitted).