Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona Ex Rel. Polk v. Hon. campbell/francis Frederick Kraps, 372 P.3d 929.

40 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Jose Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
State of Arizona v. Jose Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
State of Arizona v. Hon. marner/haniffa Ariz. 2026
State of Arizona v. Hon. marner/haniffa Ariz. 2026
State of Arizona v. Hon. James Marner; Hanees Mohamed Haniffa 560 P.3d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Hon. James Marner; Hanees Mohamed Haniffa 560 P.3d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
demonstrates the term “minor” may be understood in some contexts as a term of art that includes those posing as minors.
Shea v. Maricopa Ariz. 2023
Shea v. Maricopa Ariz. 2023
State v. Brock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Brock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
City of Surprise v. acc/lake Pleasant 437 P.3d 865 Ariz. 2019
City of Surprise v. acc/lake Pleasant 437 P.3d 865 Ariz. 2019
Polk v. Campbell , , 406 ¶ 5, , 930 (2016) (quoting Ariz. Citizens Clean Elections Comm'n v. Brain , , 325 ¶ 11, , 142 (2014) ).
State v. Green 431 P.3d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Green 431 P.3d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Polk v. Campbell , , ¶ 12
State v. Head Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Head Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
he argues such a construction was “unforeseeable” and therefore “may not be given retroactive effect.” ¶8 We review the constitutionality of a statute de novo.
State v. Lantz 430 P.3d 1262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lantz 430 P.3d 1262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Polk v. Campbell , , 406, ¶ 4, , 930 (2016).
State v. Burgess 428 P.3d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Burgess 428 P.3d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 4 (2016); ¶ 12 (App. 2005) (“Whether the trial court applied the correct sentencing statute is a question of law, which we review de novo.”).
Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Graciela Leija 422 P.3d 1033 Ariz. 2018
Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Graciela Leija 422 P.3d 1033 Ariz. 2018
¶ 12 (2016) (“We decline to effectively, if not actually, rewrite [the statute], as that is the legislature’s prerogative, not ours.”).
State v. Jones 424 P.3d 447 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jones 424 P.3d 447 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Bsi Holdings, LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of Transp. 417 P.3d 782 Ariz. 2018
Bsi Holdings, LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of Transp. 417 P.3d 782 Ariz. 2018
Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child Safety 410 P.3d 419 Ariz. 2018
Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child Safety 410 P.3d 419 Ariz. 2018
¶ 12 (2016) (“We decline to effectively, if not actually, rewrite [a statute], as that is the legislature’s prerogative, not ours.”); ¶ 11 (2015) (“It is not the function of the courts to rewrite statutes .
State of Arizona v. Lynn Lavern Burbey Ariz. 2017
State of Arizona v. Lynn Lavern Burbey Ariz. 2017
¶ 5 (2016) (citation and internal quotations omitted) (quoting Ariz. Citizens Clean Elections Comm’n v. Brain, ¶ 11 (2014)).
Dale Allen Wright v. Hon. gates/state Ariz. 2017
Dale Allen Wright v. Hon. gates/state Ariz. 2017
Kimberly McLaughlin v. Hon. jones/suzan McLaughlin Ariz. 2017
Kimberly McLaughlin v. Hon. jones/suzan McLaughlin Ariz. 2017
¶ 12 (2016) (“We decline to effectively, if not actually, rewrite [the statute], as that is the legislature’s prerogative, not ours.”).
State v. Farnsworth 389 P.3d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Farnsworth 389 P.3d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State of Arizona v. Lynn Lavern Burbey 381 P.3d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Lynn Lavern Burbey 381 P.3d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
quoting Ariz. Citizens Clean Elections Comm’n
State of Arizona v. Jamonte Lawrence Olague 381 P.3d 269 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Jamonte Lawrence Olague 381 P.3d 269 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016