Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Robert Fischer, 392 P.3d 488.

110 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Darren Lee Winegardner 413 P.3d 683 Ariz. 2018
State of Arizona v. Darren Lee Winegardner 413 P.3d 683 Ariz. 2018
¶ 19 (2017) (“It is primarily the province of the jury to determine the credibility of witnesses and to find the facts.”).
Romero v. Langston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Romero v. Langston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Corwin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Corwin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Quintiliani v. Concentric Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Quintiliani v. Concentric Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 14 (1998), ("[W]here there is a dispute in the evidence from which reasonable [persons] could arrive at different conclusions as to the ultimate facts, we will not disturb the findings of the trial court or the verdict of the jury .
Michael Soto v. Anthony M Sacco 398 P.3d 90 Ariz. 2017
Michael Soto v. Anthony M Sacco 398 P.3d 90 Ariz. 2017
Because a jury plays a vital role in our civil justice system, a trial court may not simply substitute its judgment for the jury’ ¶ 21 (2017) (“We emphasize that the court does not usurp the role of the jury in granting a new trial because the court does not substitute its judgment for that of the jury; it only allows the parties a new trial before a different jury.”); cf. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Ry.