Cited by

We therefore are “not required to dismiss an appeal even if mooted by events like an appellant’s death.” ¶ 17 (2020).

Seisinger, 220 Ariz. at 92 ¶ 28; ¶ 17 (2020) (finding procedural a statute that required courts to dismiss a criminal appeal upon the defendant’s death); id.

¶ 13 (2020) (describing procedural law as pertaining to and prescribing “the practice, method, procedure or legal machinery by which the substantive law is enforced or made effective” ()).

¶ 10 (2020); see also Ariz. Const. art. 7, § 1 (“All elections by the people shall be by ballot, or by such other method as may be prescribed by law .

See State v. Reed (Reed III), ¶ 3 (2020).

LEE/TUCSON POLICE DEPT./ ¶ 10 (2020); Scheehle, 211 Ariz. at 289 ¶ 24 (holding that Court rules “are valid even if they are not completely cohesive with related legislation, so long as they are an appropriate exercise of the court’s constitutional authority”).

T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is on remand from the Arizona Supreme Court, which specified that “the only issue” for this court to decide “is whether the restitution amount is correct.” ¶ 33 (2020).