Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Ronald Bruce Bigger, 492 P.3d 1020.

107 citing documents.

State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Jordan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Jordan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶17 We evaluate counsel’s reasonableness by examining the “practice and expectations of the legal community, and ask[], in light of all the circumstances, whether counsel’s performance was reasonable under prevailing professional norms.” ¶ 10 (2021) ( ¶ 5 (2017)).
State v. Teran 510 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Teran 510 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Rodriguez, 192 Ariz. at 63, ¶ 27 (applying harmless-error review to the refusal of a requested jury instruction); ¶ 17 (App. 2012) (); ¶ 44 (App. 2014).
State v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Thus, Strickland stands for the proposition “that suggestive identification procedures occurring as part of formal court proceedings, like those arranged by police, may trigger the procedural protections set forth in Dessureault.” ¶ 8 (App. 2012), ¶ 25 (2021).