DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Angle, 720 P.2d 79.

34 citing documents.

  • State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Dodd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Dodd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Multari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Multari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    We assume, without deciding, P.2d 79, (1986), in requesting the instruction.2 We review the denial of a requested instruction for abuse of discretion.
  • State v. Erivez 341 P.3d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Erivez 341 P.3d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Pino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Pino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    (Disorderly conduct under A.R.S.
  • State v. Estrada-Resendiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Estrada-Resendiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    2 STATE v. ESTRADA-RESENDIZ Decision of the Court
  • State v. Miranda 22 P.3d 506 Ariz. 2001
  • State v. Miranda 22 P.3d 506 Ariz. 2001
    I. ¶ 2 This court addressed the issue of whether a jury can be instructed on disorderly conduct as a
  • State v. Miranda 10 P.3d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • State v. Miranda 10 P.3d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
    Cut-right was decided after Miranda’s , (adopting the dissent of Judge Kleinschmidt in , ), upon which Miranda relied in requesting the contested instruction.
  • State v. Cutright 2 P.3d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
  • State v. Cutright 2 P.3d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
    Specifically, , required it.
  • State v. Harrison 985 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. Harrison 985 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
    in part, vacated in part on other grounds
  • State v. Foster 955 P.2d 993 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. Foster 955 P.2d 993 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
    ¶ 8 , (Kleinschmidt, J., dissenting), adopted by , for support.
  • State v. Kamai 911 P.2d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. Kamai 911 P.2d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
    129 , 130 L.Ed.2d 73 (1994); -79 , -80 (1986); Kinkade, 147 Ariz. at 253 , 709 P.2d at 887 .
  • State v. Lara 902 P.2d 1337 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Lara 902 P.2d 1337 Ariz. 1995
    In concluding that disorderly conduct can be a lesser included offense of aggravated assault
  • State v. Lara 880 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
  • State v. Lara 880 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
    (adopting the dissent of Judge Kleinschmidt in , ).
  • State v. Garcia 860 P.2d 498 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Garcia 860 P.2d 498 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
    (Kleinschmidt, J., dissenting), opinion vacated in part, dissent adopted in part
  • State v. Valdez 770 P.2d 313 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Valdez 770 P.2d 313 Ariz. 1989
    vacated in part on other grounds
  • State v. Torres 750 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
  • State v. Torres 750 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
    There must be an actual, subjective apprehension of injury, , aff'd in part, vacated in part, , but the apprehension need not extend to the fear of the gun.