DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Fulminante, 778 P.2d 602.

177 citing documents.

  • State v. Stuard 863 P.2d 881 Ariz. 1993
    1199 , 117 L.Ed.2d 439 (1992); , aff'd, 499 U.S. 279 , 111 S.Ct.
  • State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
    Amaya-Ruiz, 166 Ariz. at 178 , 800 P.2d at 1286
  • State v. Lopez 857 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Lopez 857 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1993
    2044 , 114 L.Ed.2d 129 (1991); , aff'd, 499 U.S. 279 , 111 S.Ct.
  • State v. Freeland 863 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Freeland 863 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Lopez 847 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Lopez 847 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1992
    Amaya-Ruiz, 166 Ariz. at 177 , 800 P.2d at 1285 ; , cert.
  • State v. Medrano 844 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Medrano 844 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1992
    Heinousness also concerns “a defendant’s state of mind at the time of the offense, as reflected by his words and acts.”
  • State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
    § 13-703(G)(1), the burden of proving mitigating circumstances by a preponderance of the evidence is on the defendant, , aff'd, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct.
  • State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
    (burden of proof *498 for mitigation and lack of jury participation are not unconstitutional), aff'd, Arizona v. Fulminante, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct.
  • State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
    See, , (burden of proof on defendant for mitigating circumstances constitutional), ce rt.
  • State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
    3289 , 111 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990) (vagueness); Walton, , (imposition not arbitrary and capricious, vagueness, judicial discretion, burden of proof in weighing aggravation and mitigation, burden of proof of mitigation, jury participation); , (vagueness, judicial discretion, standard for balancing aggravating and mitigating factors, burden of proof of mitigation, jury participation), cer t. granted on other grounds, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Jimenez 799 P.2d 785 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Jimenez 799 P.2d 785 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
    See, e.g,, , (“especially heinous, cruel or depraved” aggravating circumstance not unconstitutionally vague); , (burden of proof on defendant for mitigating circumstances constitutional); -84 , -37 (1986) (jury trial not required for capital sentence); , (prosecutorial discretion uph
  • State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
    reconsideration granted on other grounds, (July 11, 1989), and rejected the defendant’s claim that he had a constitutional right to voir dire the trial judge.