Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. King, 763 P.2d 239.

127 citing documents.

State v. Mendoza 823 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Dawson 792 P.2d 741 Ariz. 1990
State v. Dawson 792 P.2d 741 Ariz. 1990
State v. Georgeoff 788 P.2d 1185 Ariz. 1990
State v. Georgeoff 788 P.2d 1185 Ariz. 1990
State v. Ruelas 798 P.2d 1335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Serna 787 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1990
State v. Serna 787 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1990
The error must significantly contribute to the verdict and “the prejudicial nature of the unobjected-to error must be evaluated in light of the entire record.”
State v. Conner 786 P.2d 948 Ariz. 1990
State v. Webb 793 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Conner 786 P.2d 948 Ariz. 1990
State v. Marlow 786 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1989
State v. Marlow 786 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1989
State v. Valles 780 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1989
State v. Valles 780 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1989
Mincey, 130 Ariz. at 397 , 636 P.2d at 645 ( , ); Defendant asserts that the omissions in the jury instructions constituted fundamental error.
State v. Lundstrom 776 P.2d 1067 Ariz. 1989
State v. Lundstrom 776 P.2d 1067 Ariz. 1989
at 493 , 759 P.2d at 639 ; , (finding fundamental error in definition of defendant’s burden of proof of insanity).
State v. Leonardo 776 P.2d 789 Ariz. 1989
State v. Leonardo 776 P.2d 789 Ariz. 1989
State v. Gardfrey 775 P.2d 1095 Ariz. 1989
State v. Gardfrey 775 P.2d 1095 Ariz. 1989
In re the Appeal in Yuma County Juvenile Court Action Number J-87-119 779 P.2d 1276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
In re the Appeal in Yuma County Juvenile Court Action Number J-87-119 779 P.2d 1276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Valdez 770 P.2d 313 Ariz. 1989
State v. Valdez 770 P.2d 313 Ariz. 1989
763 E.2d 239, 244 (1988) (error in defining the terms used in instructing the jury on the quantum of proof necessary for a defendant to establish the insanity defense is fundamental).
State v. Renforth 763 P.2d 983 Ariz. 1988
State v. Renforth 763 P.2d 983 Ariz. 1988
ORDER ORDERED: That the order of November 17, 1987