Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Robinson, 735 P.2d 801.

201 citing documents.

State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Smith v. Burnett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Smith v. Burnett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
§ 13-3601, and on appeal, “[w]e may affirm on any basis supported by the record,”
State v. Gilligan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gilligan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“homemade amateur pornography.” We review the 3 STATE v. GILLIGAN Decision of the Court court’s ruling on the admissibility of evidence for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 38 (App. 2013), and may affirm the ruling on any basis supported by the record
Bennett v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Bennett v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
7 BENNETT v. DAVIS Decision of the Court dismissing her order of protection—that she “failed to meet her burden of proof on her second Order of Protection.” “We may affirm on any basis supported by the record.” (citation omitted).
Steven Sholem v. Hons. gass/contes/melissa Langevin 460 P.3d 273 Ariz. 2020
Steven Sholem v. Hons. gass/contes/melissa Langevin 460 P.3d 273 Ariz. 2020
State of Arizona v. Thomas Michael Riley Ariz. 2020
State of Arizona v. Thomas Michael Riley Ariz. 2020
State v. Chavarria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Chavarria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“We may affirm on any basis supported by the record.”
State v. Zamora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Zamora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Perez-Tapia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Perez-Tapia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Weber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Weber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kresock v. Depaoli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kresock v. Depaoli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
the course of our review, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the sanction, -83 (App. 1988) (citing Davis v. Tucson Ariz. Boys Choir Soc’y, ), and will affirm if there is any basis to do so supported by the record, ¶ 33 (App. 2010) ().
State v. Scroggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Scroggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“We may affirm on any basis supported by the record.”
Rodriguez v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Rodriguez v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(holding that an appellate court may affirm on any basis supported by the record).
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“We may affirm on any basis supported by the record.”
State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
We review the summary dismissal of a post-conviction relief proceeding for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 17 (2006) (), and will affirm “on any basis supported by the record,” (citing M. Udall & J. Livermore, Law of Evidence § 13, at 22 (2d ed. 1982)).
State v. Beasley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wyatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Beasley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(“We may affirm on any basis supported by the record.”).
State v. Wyatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sommerfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sommerfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“We may affirm on any basis supported by the record.” (citation omitted).
State v. Loya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Loya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-15 (1989) (“Defense counsel’s determinations of trial strategy, even if later proven unsuccessful, are not ineffective assistance of counsel.
State v. Cloud Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cloud Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
We may affirm the superior court’s ruling “on any basis supported by the record.”
State v. Braxton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Braxton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Tiggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Tiggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
We may uphold the trial court’s ruling “on any basis supported by the record.”
State v. James 393 P.3d 467 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. James 393 P.3d 467 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
¶¶ 14, 24-25 , 113 (App. 2013) (distinguishing ruling under Rule 404(c) from one on motion to suppress evidence).