Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. D'AMBROSIO, 750 P.2d 14.

90 citing documents.

State v. Campos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Campos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
A defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing only if the PCR petition presents a colorable claim, State v. D’Ambrosio, which is one that if true, would have probably changed the verdict or sentence, ¶ 8 (2016).
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Simpson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Simpson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
P. 33.11(a); ¶ 11 (2016) (“If the alleged facts would not have probably changed the verdict or sentence, then the claim is subject to summary dismissal.”); State v. D’Ambrosio, (a PCR petitioner must present a colorable claim to be entitled to an evidentiary hearing).
State v. Estling Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Estling Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 19 (2012); see State v. D’Ambrosio, (“A decision as to whether a petition for post-conviction relief presents a colorable claim is, to some extent, a discretionary decision for the trial court.”).
State v. Acuna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Acuna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 11 (2016); see also State v. D’Ambrosio, (noting defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing if he or she presents a colorable claim.).
State v. Brock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Brock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See State v. D’Ambrosio, (recognizing a Rule 32 petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing if he or she presents a colorable claim).
State v. Nye Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Nye Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See State v. D’Ambrosio, (recognizing a PCR petitioner must present a colorable claim to be entitled to an evidentiary hearing).
State v. Donald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Donald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Mendoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Mendoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See State v. D’Ambrosio, (noting a defendant who presents a colorable claim is entitled to an evidentiary hearing).
State v. Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lopata Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lopata Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Warner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Warner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“A decision as to whether a petition for post-conviction relief presents a colorable claim is, to some extent, a discretionary decision for the trial court.” State v. D’Ambrosio
State v. Contreras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“A decision as to whether a petition for post-conviction relief presents a colorable claim is, to some extent, a discretionary decision for the trial court.” State v. D=Ambrosio
State v. Contreras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Dwyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Dwyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
And though, as the superior court acknowledged, Dwyer presented evidence “from which it can be fairly inferred that his trial counsel was using drugs and/or alcohol during the general time of [Dwyer]’s trial,” drug and alcohol abuse during trial, “standing alone, does not establish a per se violation of a criminal defendant’s right to receive effective assistance of counsel.” State v. D’Ambrosio
State v. Faccio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Faccio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Barriga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Barriga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Crockett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Crockett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017