Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Guerra, 778 P.2d 1185.

615 citing documents.

State v. Guerrero 840 P.2d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
However, “[a]n improper comment on [a] defendant’s silence may be harmless error.”
State v. Ritacca 819 P.2d 987 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Ritacca 819 P.2d 987 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Albrecht 811 P.2d 791 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Albrecht 811 P.2d 791 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Mada 812 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Mada 812 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
FACTS Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the verdict, , .(1989), the facts are as follows.
State v. Terrell 811 P.2d 364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Terrell 811 P.2d 364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
FACTS Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to appellee, , the facts are as follows.
State v. Barger 810 P.2d 191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Barger 810 P.2d 191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Dunn 803 P.2d 917 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Dunn 803 P.2d 917 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
FACTS Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, , the evidence at trial established that on June 21,1989, Dunn took cocaine into Mexico and then re-entered Arizona with the cocaine.
State v. Smith 803 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Smith 803 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
if there is no substantial evidence to warrant a conviction.”