Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Romanosky, 782 P.2d 693.

76 citing documents.

State v. Kiles 857 P.2d 1212 Ariz. 1993
State v. Kiles 857 P.2d 1212 Ariz. 1993
State v. Spencer 859 P.2d 146 Ariz. 1993
State v. Simms 863 P.2d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Simms 863 P.2d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
(“The statement in question is a simple assertion of appellant’s conduct.
State v. Spencer 859 P.2d 146 Ariz. 1993
The trial court properly found that the statutory definitions of these offenses necessarily involve the use or threat of violence against a person ( , A.R.S.
State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-123196 834 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-123196 834 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Schaaf 819 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1991
State v. Schaaf 819 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1991
1589 , 113 L.Ed.2d 653 (1991); , , , , cert.
State v. Lavers 814 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1991
State v. Lavers 814 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1991
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
§ 13-703(F)(2), a prior conviction must be for a felony that, by statutory definition, involves the “use of or threat of violence on another person.” , , cert.
State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
-28 , -04 (1989) ( , ); , (resisting arrest conviction does not qualify as a § 13-703(F)(2) aggravating circumstance).
State v. Anaya 799 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Anaya 799 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Serna 787 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1990
State v. Serna 787 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1990
State v. Lopez 786 P.2d 959 Ariz. 1990
State v. Lopez 786 P.2d 959 Ariz. 1990
where we held "[Qf, under the statutory definition the defendant could have committed and been convicted of the crime without using or threatening violence, the prior conviction may not qualify as a statutory aggravating circumstance under A.R.S.