DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Valles, 780 P.2d 1049.

32 citing documents.

  • State v. Rix 536 P.3d 253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Rix 536 P.3d 253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • State v. Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • State v. Bryant Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Bryant Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State of Arizona v. Mark Goudeau 372 P.3d 945 Ariz. 2016
  • State of Arizona v. Mark Goudeau 372 P.3d 945 Ariz. 2016
    (finding evidence of prior robbery admissible under Rule 404(b) when both robberies occurred around the same time and bore sufficient similarities in the way the defendant distorted his appearance, carried a gun, and demanded money from a back room safe); Fierro, 107 Ariz. at 482–83, 489
  • State v. Craft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Craft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    o, or in defiance of the law; disobeying or disregarding the law.”).1 “Where terms used in an instruction have no technical meaning peculiar to the law in the case but are used in their ordinary sense and commonly understood by those familiar with the English language, the court need not define these terms.”
  • State v. Moody 94 P.3d 1119 Ariz. 2004
  • State v. Moody 94 P.3d 1119 Ariz. 2004
    15 , (“Failure to object to a jury instruction below precludes defendant from claiming error on appeal unless the error is fundamental.”).
  • In Re Roy L. 4 P.3d 984 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • In Re Roy L. 4 P.3d 984 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • State v. Young 965 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. Young 965 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. Terrazas 944 P.2d 1194 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Terrazas 944 P.2d 1194 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
    See Marahrens, 114 Ariz. at 307 , 560 P.2d at 1214
  • State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
    State v. Corcoran (Treadaway), , , State v. Mit
  • State v. Fullem 912 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. Fullem 912 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. Eastlack 883 P.2d 999 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Eastlack 883 P.2d 999 Ariz. 1994
    “Failure to object to a jury instruction below precludes defendant from claiming error on appeal unless the error is fundamental____ Error is fundamental only if it goes to the foundation of the case or deprives the defendant of a right essential to his defense.”
  • State v. Berryman 875 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
  • State v. Berryman 875 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
    8 n. 4, , 917 n. 4 (1988)
  • State v. Gallegos 870 P.2d 1097 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Gallegos 870 P.2d 1097 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Armstrong 862 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Armstrong 862 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
    555 *474 (1981); , State ex rel.