DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Valdez, 770 P.2d 313.

129 citing documents.

  • State v. Rudi Apelt 861 P.2d 654 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Russell 858 P.2d 674 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Russell 858 P.2d 674 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
    See, e.g., Cook, 170 Ariz. at 50 , 821 P.2d at 741 ; Gendron, 168 Ariz. at 155 , 812 P.2d at 628
  • State v. Andersen 868 P.2d 964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Andersen 868 P.2d 964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
    E.g., Atwood, 171 Ariz. at 599 , 832 P.2d at 618
  • State v. Medrano 844 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Medrano 844 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1992
    Though no evidence on this issue was taken because the trial court erroneously ruled that the question could be raised on direct appeal and therefore was precluded, , we are able to “clearly determine from the record that the ineffective assistance claim is meritless.”
  • State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
    Because competent trial strategy and performance may take on as many forms as there are cases, “this court is reluctant to decide claims of ineffective assistance in advance of an evidentiary hearing to determine the reasons for coun *499 sel’s actions or inactions on any particular point.”
  • State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Anaya 825 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Anaya 825 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Huffman 820 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Huffman 820 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Valdez 806 P.2d 1376 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Valdez 806 P.2d 1376 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Garcia 799 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Garcia 799 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
    Recently, , the supreme court held that before the appellate court will consider an ineffectiveness assistance of counsel claim, defendants must present the question to the trial court pursuant to Rule 32, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure.
  • State v. Webb 793 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Webb 793 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Dumaine 783 P.2d 1184 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Dumaine 783 P.2d 1184 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Carver 771 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Carver 771 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1989
    Recently, , this Court recommended that defendants raise the question of ineffective assistance under Rule 32, Ariz.R.Crim.P., 17 A.R.S.