Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Salazar, 844 P.2d 566.
-
Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
847 P.2d 595
Ariz. 1993
In light of our “healthy respect for stare decisis,’’ , we do not lightly overrule precedent and do so only for compelling reasons, see
- State v. Herrera, Jr. 859 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1993
- State v. HERRERA, SR. 859 P.2d 119 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Herrera, Jr. 859 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1993
- State v. HERRERA, SR. 859 P.2d 119 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Landrigan 859 P.2d 111 Ariz. 1993
-
State v. Landrigan
859 P.2d 111
Ariz. 1993
-417 , -584 (1992), we have not conducted a proportionality review.
- State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
-
State v. Hill
848 P.2d 1375
Ariz. 1993
-418 , -85 (1992) (adopting Justice Corcoran’s rationale in White, 168 Ariz. at 517-24 , 815 P.2d at 886-93 (Corcoran, J., specially concurring).
- State v. Lopez 847 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1992
- State v. Lopez 847 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1992