Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. West, 862 P.2d 192.

167 citing documents.

State v. Guerra 958 P.2d 452 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Guerra 958 P.2d 452 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Tankersley 956 P.2d 486 Ariz. 1998
State v. Tankersley 956 P.2d 486 Ariz. 1998
State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
State v. Rienhardt 951 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1997
State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
we held that the trial court has “no obligation to instruct the jury on theories withdrawn in the prosecutor’s discretion.” Id.
State v. Rienhardt 951 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1997
State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
Death-eligible class not sufficiently narrowed, , (citing Lowenfield v. Phelps, 484 U.S. 231, 244 , 108 S.Ct.
State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
State v. Jones 937 P.2d 310 Ariz. 1997
State v. Jones 937 P.2d 310 Ariz. 1997
State v. Mann 934 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1997
State v. Mann 934 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1997
State v. Schwartz 935 P.2d 891 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Schwartz 935 P.2d 891 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
444 & n. 3, , 204 & n. 3 *279 (1993), cert.
State v. Lee 917 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1996
State v. Lee 917 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1996
3047, 3055-56 , 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990); , cert.
State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
State v. Mata 916 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1996
State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
Inventory searches are permissible if “conducted pursuant to standardized criteria and not because of mere suspicions of criminal activity.” , cert.
State v. Gallegos 916 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1996
State v. Miles 918 P.2d 1028 Ariz. 1996
State v. Miles 918 P.2d 1028 Ariz. 1996
We rejected the argument that the equal protection clause requires that the jury, and not the judge, , cert.
State v. Gallegos 916 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1996
215 , 133 L.Ed.2d 146 (1995) (finding de minimis mitigation where defendant believed he did not have substance abuse problems and therefore failed to seek treatment); , cert.
State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996
State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996
State v. Carey 920 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
State v. Carey 920 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
State v. Gulbrandson 906 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1995
State v. Gulbrandson 906 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1995
(holding that questioning prospective jurors about their position on the death sentence is permissible to determine whether jurors can perform their duties); -40 , -200 (1993), cert.
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Walden 905 P.2d 974 Ariz. 1995
State v. Walden 905 P.2d 974 Ariz. 1995
State v. Portillo 898 P.2d 970 Ariz. 1995
State v. Portillo 898 P.2d 970 Ariz. 1995
444 n. 3, , 204 n. 3 (1993) (RAJI 5) , (“doubt that would cause a reasonable man to pause or hesitate when called upon to act upon the most important affairs of life”).
State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
State v. Ekmanis 901 P.2d 1210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Ekmanis 901 P.2d 1210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
See Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure 21.3(c); , cert.
State v. Cid 892 P.2d 216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995