Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Draper, 784 P.2d 259.

27 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
(“A criminal defendant does not have a right to a plea agreement.”); –32 (1980) (“Far from being available upon a defendant’s demand, a plea bargain can be obtained only by agreement among the defendant, his counsel and the prosecuting attorney, subject to the appro
State v. Chambers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Chambers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Boozer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Boozer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(“[E]xcept in the most unusual circumstances, it offends basic notions of minimal competence of representation for defense counsel to fail to interview any state witnesses prior to a major felony trial.”).
J.D. M.M. v. Hon. hegyi/t.D./state of Arizona 335 P.3d 1118 Ariz. 2014
J.D. M.M. v. Hon. hegyi/t.D./state of Arizona 335 P.3d 1118 Ariz. 2014
Id.; (discussing, prior to VBR, circumstances in which court could order deposition of victim who refused to be interviewed).
Wilshire Insurance v. S.A. 227 P.3d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Wilshire Insurance v. S.A. 227 P.3d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
See, e.g., Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 2.1 (Victims’ Bill of Rights)
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rayes 141 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State v. Secord 88 P.3d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Secord 88 P.3d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
He argued he was “entitled to review th[e] videotape”
Romley v. Schneider 45 P.3d 685 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Romley v. Schneider 45 P.3d 685 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
P. 39(b); , (finding that the protections of Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 39 “reflect a public policy to reduce the harm and trauma inflicted on a victim by a criminal act”).
State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
See State v. Draper, 162 Ariz 433, 440, -32 , -48 (1980).
State v. Rushton 837 P.2d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Rushton 837 P.2d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See, , , [2]66 (1989) (public policy favors protection of victims from harm and trauma).
State v. Jackson 821 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Jackson 821 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Kinslow 799 P.2d 844 Ariz. 1990
State v. Kinslow 799 P.2d 844 Ariz. 1990
See, , (public policy favors protection of victims from harm and trauma).
State v. Watton 793 P.2d 80 Ariz. 1990
State v. Watton 793 P.2d 80 Ariz. 1990
Austin v. Alfred 788 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Austin v. Alfred 788 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)