DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Ojeda, 769 P.2d 1006.

64 citing documents.

  • State v. King 873 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. King 873 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
    (remand unnecessary where record clearly shows the trial court would have reached the same result even without consideration of the improper factors).
  • State v. Martin 829 P.2d 349 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
  • State v. Martin 829 P.2d 349 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
  • State v. Perez Lara 823 P.2d 70 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
  • State v. Perez Lara 823 P.2d 70 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
    But because “it is unclear whether the judge would have imposed the same sentence absent the inappropriate [factor], the case must be remanded for resentencing.”
  • State v. Cereceres 800 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Cereceres 800 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Jones 788 P.2d 1249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Jones 788 P.2d 1249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Shuler 780 P.2d 1067 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
  • State v. Shuler 780 P.2d 1067 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
    the court held that: [W]hen one or more, but not all, of the findings of probation violation are set aside on appeal, the order of revocation and the sentence should be set aside and the case remanded to the trial court for a new disposition hearing unless the record clearly shows th
  • State v. Davis 769 P.2d 1008 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Davis 769 P.2d 1008 Ariz. 1989
    that where some of the alleged probation violations are set aside on appeal the case should be remanded to the trial court for a new disposition hearing unless the record clearly shows the sentencing court would have revoked probation and imposed the same sentence without the improper findings.