Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Jonas, 792 P.2d 705.

36 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Evan McCarrick Jerald 548 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Evan McCarrick Jerald 548 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
See, e.g., Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11, 28-31 (2003) (affirming life sentence for recidivist offender convicted of stealing three golf clubs valued at $1,200); (affirming 25-year sentence for recidivist offender convicted of selling one marijuana cigarette to a 14-year-old for one dollar).
State v. Chacon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Chacon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Accordingly, we modify the written sentencing memorandum to reflect the conviction for “armed robbery with a simulated deadly weapon.” n.1 (1990) (modifying written judgment to reflect the actual judgment entered).
State v. Marlin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Marlin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ali 895 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 2017
State v. Lofton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Lofton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“A defendant has no constitutional right to concurrent sentences for two separate crimes involving separate acts.” ( ).
State of Arizona v. Manuel Fernando Florez 384 P.3d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Manuel Fernando Florez 384 P.3d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
¶ 30; see Ewing, 538 U.S. at 19, 30-31 (upholding sentence of twenty-five years to life for felony grand theft when defendant had four previous convictions for serious or violent felonies); Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 961, 994, 996 (1991) (upholding first-time offender’s life sentence for possessing 672 grams of cocaine); (upholding recidivist offender’s twenty-five year sentence for selling $1 marijuana cigarette to minor).
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
at 479, ¶¶ 27-28 (quoting United States v. Aiello, 864 F.2d 257, 265 (2d Cir. 1988), ¶ 47 (2003)).
State v. James 372 P.3d 311 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. James 372 P.3d 311 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.1 (1990); n.2 (App. 1994) (“When we are able to ascertain the trial court’s intention by reference to the record, remand for clarification is unnecessary.”).
State of Arizona v. Mark Noriki Kasic 265 P.3d 410 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Mark Noriki Kasic 265 P.3d 410 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
separate crimes involving separate acts.”
State v. Berger 134 P.3d 378 Ariz. 2006
State v. Berger 134 P.3d 378 Ariz. 2006
“A defendant has no constitutional right to concurrent sentences for two separate crimes involving separate acts.”
State v. Berger 103 P.3d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Berger 103 P.3d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
The compulsory nature of a sentence does not make it disproportionate per se, particularly when the trial court has discretion to impose the mitigated end of a scale, , 12 and the Supreme Court has “never invalidated a penalty mandated by a legislature based only on the length of sentence!!]” Harmelin, 501 U.S. at 1006-07 , 111 S.Ct.
State v. Davis 79 P.3d 64 Ariz. 2003
State v. Jones 937 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Jones 937 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
See, , (25 years flat time where defendant sold two marijuana cigarettes to 14-year-old boy); , (2,975 years flat time where defendant convicted of 85 counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, sexual conduct with a minor under 15, and attempted sexual c
State v. DePiano 926 P.2d 494 Ariz. 1996
State v. Lujan 911 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. DePiano 926 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. DePiano 926 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State Ex Rel. Bowers v. Superior Court 839 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State Ex Rel. Bowers v. Superior Court 839 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Bartlett 830 P.2d 823 Ariz. 1992
State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
State v. Kasten 823 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Followed State v. Kasten 823 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Ross 804 P.2d 112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Ross 804 P.2d 112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
(sentence of 25 years for selling small quantity of marijuana to a fourteen-year-old child not cruel and unusual punishment); , (aggregate sentence of 2,975 years for 85 counts of crimes against children not cruel and unusual punishment); State v