Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Greenway, 823 P.2d 22.

169 citing documents.

State v. Djerf 959 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1998
State v. Djerf 959 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1998
State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
117 , 136 L.Ed.2d 68 (1996); -65 , -32 (1991) (holding “there is no double-counting of an element of robbery when the State proves pecuniary gain as an aggravating factor”).
State v. Jones 937 P.2d 310 Ariz. 1997
State v. Jones 937 P.2d 310 Ariz. 1997
State v. Soto-Fong 928 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1996
State v. Soto-Fong 928 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1996
724 , 126 L.Ed.2d 688 (1994); , State v. Lavers, 168 Ariz. at 392 , 814 P.2d at 349 .
State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
State v. Laird 920 P.2d 769 Ariz. 1996
State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
-68 , -35 (1991) (explaining that the (F)(8) aggravating circumstance applies to multiple murders).
State v. Laird 920 P.2d 769 Ariz. 1996
We rejected the argument that Arizona’s
State v. Towery 920 P.2d 290 Ariz. 1996
State v. Towery 920 P.2d 290 Ariz. 1996
Arizona’s death penalty statute insufficiently channels the sentencer’s discretion This claim has been rejected in West, 176 Ariz. at 454 , 862 P.2d at 214, and State v. *190 Greenway
State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
-68 , -35 (1991) (explaining that the (F)(8) aggravating factor applies to multiple murders); , , cert.
State v. Gallegos 916 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1996
State v. Gallegos 916 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1996
State v. Kemp 912 P.2d 1281 Ariz. 1996
State v. Kemp 912 P.2d 1281 Ariz. 1996
State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996
State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996
State v. Gulbrandson 906 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1995
State v. Gulbrandson 906 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1995
Bolton, 182 Ariz. at 316 , 896 P.2d at 856
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
Amaya-Ruiz, 166 Ariz. at 177-78 , 800 P.2d at 1285-86 .
State v. Williams 904 P.2d 437 Ariz. 1995
State v. Williams 904 P.2d 437 Ariz. 1995
2909, 2923-31 , 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976)
State v. Stokley 898 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1995
State v. Stokley 898 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1995
State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
3047 , 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990); -66 , -33 (1991).
State v. Gonzales 892 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1995
State v. Gonzales 892 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1995
State v. Hinchey 890 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1995
State v. Hinchey 890 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1995
(death by lethal gas not cruel and unusual).
State v. Ross 886 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1994
State v. Ross 886 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1994
(“Arizona’s death penalty statute narrowly defines the class of death-eligible persons.”).
State v. King 883 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1994
State v. King 883 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1994
-68 , -35 (1991) (rejecting double jeopardy argument and finding aggravating factor applied to each of defendant’s first degree murder convictions when both murders were committed during commission of offense); , (same).
State v. Ramirez 871 P.2d 237 Ariz. 1994
State v. Ramirez 871 P.2d 237 Ariz. 1994
State v. Scott 865 P.2d 792 Ariz. 1993
State v. Scott 865 P.2d 792 Ariz. 1993
Gillies, 135 Ariz. at 512 , 662 P.2d at 1019 (“the receipt of money must be established as a cause of the murder, not a result”).
State v. Henry 863 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1993
State v. Henry 863 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1993