Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Lavers, 814 P.2d 333.

269 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela 426 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2018
State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela 426 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2018
State v. Buttita Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Buttita Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
7 STATE v. BUTITTA Decision of the Court exists from which the jury could reasonably conclude that it is authentic.’” ¶ 18 (App. 2010) ().
State v. Sotelo-Nava Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Sotelo-Nava Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Before we may engage in a fundamental error analysis, however, we must first find that the trial court committed some error.”
State v. Weber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Weber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(before engaging in fundamental error review, this court must first find that error occurred).
State v. Stelmasek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Stelmasek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Fell 393 P.3d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Fell 393 P.3d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
The trial court “does not determine whether the evidence is authentic, but only whether evidence exists from which the jury could reasonably conclude that it is authentic,”
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(appellate court reviews trial court’s decision to dismiss a potential juror for an abuse of discretion).
State v. Ramos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ramos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-68, ¶¶ 19-26, -08 (2005); (recognizing that before a reviewing court engages in fundamental error review, it must first conclude the trial court committed some error).
Stafford v. Burns 389 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Stafford v. Burns 389 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Alvarado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Alvarado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“Before we may engage in a fundamental error analysis, however, we must first find that the trial court committed some error.” (citation omitted).
State v. Connatser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Connatser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“Before we may engage in a fundamental error analysis, however, we must first find that the trial court committed some error.”
State v. Myers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Myers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(1991) (“Before we may engage in a fundamental error analysis, however, we must first find that the trial court committed some error.”).
State v. Clary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Clary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(recognizing that, before a reviewing court may engage in fundamental error analysis, it must first find the trial court committed some error).
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“Before we may engage in a fundamental error analysis, however, we must first find that the trial court committed some error.”
State v. Meyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Meyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Arizona v. Mark Goudeau 372 P.3d 945 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Mark Goudeau 372 P.3d 945 Ariz. 2016
“Mental anguish includes the victim’s uncertainty as to her ultimate fate,” and evidence of a victim’s pleas or defensive injuries may be sufficient to show that she suffered mental pain, Snelling, 225 Ariz. at 188 ¶ 27, 236 P.3d at 415.
State v. Steinle ex rel. County of Maricopa 372 P.3d 939 Ariz. 2016
State v. Hon. steinle/alejandra Moran Ariz. 2016
State v. Hon. steinle/alejandra Moran Ariz. 2016
State v. Steinle ex rel. County of Maricopa 372 P.3d 939 Ariz. 2016
State v. Meza-Contreras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Meza-Contreras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(“Before we may engage in a fundamental error analysis, however, we must first find that the trial court committed some error.”).
State v. Porras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Porras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Togstad Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Togstad Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
The trial court’s role is not to determine the authenticity of the evidence, but instead to determine “whether evidence exists from which the jury could reasonably conclude that it is authentic.“
State v. Parrinello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Parrinello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Wagner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Wagner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(1991) (“Before we may engage in a fundamental error analysis, however, we must first find that the trial court committed some error.”).
State v. Goold Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Goold Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Yashar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Loyd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016