Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Serna, 807 P.2d 1109.

28 citing documents.

State v. Ketchner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Ketchner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 78 (2013); (“Absent an abuse of discretion, we will not disturb a trial judge’s determination that a new trial for newly discovered evidence is not necessary.”).
State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(describing the elements required for a claim of newly discovered evidence).
State v. King 480 P.3d 1250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. King 480 P.3d 1250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela 426 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2018
State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela 426 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2018
State v. Nordstrom 25 P.3d 717 Ariz. 2001
State v. Nordstrom 25 P.3d 717 Ariz. 2001
State v. Saenz 4 P.3d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. Saenz 4 P.3d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
(whether to grant a defendant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence is for trial court to decide in exercise of its discretion); , (reviewing court will not disturb trial court’s decision to grant or deny post-conviction relief unless tr
State v. Soto-Fong 928 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1996
State v. Soto-Fong 928 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1996
Absent an abuse of discretion, we will not disturb a trial judge’s determination that a new trial for newly discovered evidence is not necessary.” , , cert.
State v. Dunlap 930 P.2d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Dunlap 930 P.2d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Orantez 902 P.2d 824 Ariz. 1995
State v. Orantez 902 P.2d 824 Ariz. 1995
State v. Henry 863 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1993
State v. Henry 863 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1993
(abuse of discretion standard).
State v. Fisher 859 P.2d 179 Ariz. 1993
State v. Fisher 859 P.2d 179 Ariz. 1993
State v. Medrano 844 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1992
State v. Medrano 844 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1992
State v. Schaaf 819 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1991
State v. Schaaf 819 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1991
post-conviction relief denied, , petition for cert.