Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Buccini, 810 P.2d 178.

64 citing documents.

  • State v. Gilfillan 998 P.2d 1069 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • State v. Gilfillan 998 P.2d 1069 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
    Accordingly, the constitutionality of a statute is a matter of law which we review de novo, , and we will resolve all uncertainties in favor of constitutionality.
  • Rodriguez v. Gavette 3 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
  • Rodriguez v. Gavette 3 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
    Like its criminal counterpart, probable cause is intended to be a “practical, nontechnical conception.” ¶ 30 While the ultimate determination of probable cause is a legal issue, which we review de novo, -56 , -84 (1991); Hockett, 139 Ariz. at 320 , 678 P.2d at 505 , it is intensely fact-based, and we must defer to the trial court’s superior opportunity to view the witnesses and evaluate the evidence in determining those facts.
  • City of Tucson v. Rineer 971 P.2d 207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
  • City of Tucson v. Rineer 971 P.2d 207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
  • Arizona Department of Public Safety v. Superior Court 949 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • Arizona Department of Public Safety v. Superior Court 949 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
    A statute’s constitutionality is a matter of law analyzed de novo by this court, State v. Buccini , beginning with the presumption that the statute is constitutional.
  • State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
    2674, 2684-85 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978)
  • State v. Williams 909 P.2d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. Williams 909 P.2d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. DeWitt 897 P.2d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
  • State v. DeWitt 897 P.2d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994