Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Lopez, 847 P.2d 1078.

94 citing documents.

  • State v. Rhodes 200 P.3d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
  • State v. Rhodes 200 P.3d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
    “When presenting his case, the defendant may offer evidence of his good character as substantive evidence from which the jury may infer that he did not commit the crime charged.” , (holding that it was error to preclude testimony, in a murder and child abuse trial, that defendant was “a non-violent individual who was caring when dealing with children”).
  • State v. Ellison 140 P.3d 899 Ariz. 2006
  • State v. Ellison 140 P.3d 899 Ariz. 2006
    “Promises of benefits or leniency, whether direct or implied, even if only slight in value, are impermissibly coercive.” State v. Lopez, 174 Ariz. 131, 138
  • State v. Vandever 119 P.3d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
  • State v. Vandever 119 P.3d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
    A defendant, in presenting his ease, “may offer evidence of his good character as substantive evidence from which the jury may infer that he did not commit the crime charged.” , see Ariz. R. Evid.
  • State v. Blakley 65 P.3d 77 Ariz. 2003
  • State v. Blakley 65 P.3d 77 Ariz. 2003
    Courts must “look to the totality of the circumstances surrounding the confession and decide whether the will of the defendant has been overborne.”
  • State of Arizona v. Alice C. Jeffrey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
  • State of Arizona v. Alice C. Jeffrey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
  • State v. Pettit 979 P.2d 5 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. Pettit 979 P.2d 5 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Jones 937 P.2d 310 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Jones 937 P.2d 310 Ariz. 1997
    See State v. (George Molina) Lopez, -44 , -91 (1992) (finding cruelty when a one-year-old victim died of *400 blunt-force trauma to the head, abdomen, and chest; doctor testified that the victim must have suffered for about 45 minutes from the injuries).
  • State v. Lacy 929 P.2d 1288 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Lacy 929 P.2d 1288 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Soto-Fong 928 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Soto-Fong 928 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1996
    2726 , 129 L.Ed.2d 849 (1994); State v. Lopez (George), , cert.
  • State v. Doody 930 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Doody 930 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
    In assessing the voluntariness of a confession, we “look to the totality of the circumstances surrounding the eonfession and determine whether the will of the defendant has been overborne.” , cert.
  • State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Miles 918 P.2d 1028 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Miles 918 P.2d 1028 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Hurles 914 P.2d 1291 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Hurles 914 P.2d 1291 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Gulbrandson 906 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Gulbrandson 906 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1995
    Rule 403, Arizona Rules of Evidence; , cert.
  • State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Stokley 898 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Stokley 898 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1995
    “Such photographs cannot be deemed sufficiently gruesome to inflame the jurors because ‘the crime committed was so atrocious that photographs could add little to the repugnance felt by anyone who heard the testimony.’ ” , (citation omitted), ce rt.
  • State v. Williams 898 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. Williams 898 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. Willoughby 892 P.2d 1319 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Willoughby 892 P.2d 1319 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. DePiano 926 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. DePiano 926 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. Styers 865 P.2d 765 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Styers 865 P.2d 765 Ariz. 1993
    -43 , , 1088-90 *111 (1992), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993