Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gendron, 812 P.2d 626.

321 citing documents.

State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Mendoza-Saravia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Leary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sharkey v. Sharkey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Leary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Mendoza-Saravia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sharkey v. Sharkey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(stating the general rule that failure to raise an issue at trial waives that issue on appeal).
State v. Philpot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Philpot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Albano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Albano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hollingsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hollingsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
the error must be clear, egregious, and curable only via a new trial.”
State v. Turvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Turvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Begay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Begay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Schweigert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Schweigert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Fundamental error is error which is “clear, egregious and curable only via a new trial.”
State v. Burke 360 P.3d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Burke 360 P.3d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
§ 13-105[(10)(b)].” vacated in part on other grounds, P.2d 626 (1991); see generally Lamb Excavation, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Mortg.
State of Arizona v. Ronald Vassell 359 P.3d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Ronald Vassell 359 P.3d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
In Arizona, we apply the analogous standard of fundamental error review when an instruction-related issue has not been preserved below, -55, -28 (1991), except in those very rare circumstances involving structural error, which is not present here.
State v. Bedoni Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bedoni Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Hayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Hayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Franklin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Franklin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Brunson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Brunson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Sayegh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Sayegh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Patino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Patino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Carrier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Carrier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Guinard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Guinard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
2 STATE v. GUINARD Decision of the Court 153, 154, (finding that the failure to raise an issue at trial waives all but fundamental error).
State v. Buechler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Buechler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(holding error qualifies as fundamental when it is “clear, egregious and curable only via a new trial”).
State v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014