Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Hill, 848 P.2d 1375.
- State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington 266 P.3d 1057 Ariz. 2011
- State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington 266 P.3d 1057 Ariz. 2011
- State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
-
State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
321, 1383 (1993) (finding no abuse of discretion in court‟s refusal to strike police officer for cause); see also A.R.S.
- Chopin v. Chopin 232 P.3d 99 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
Chopin v. Chopin
232 P.3d 99
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
(stating that when a court fails to make a ruling on a motion it is treated as denied).
- Taser International, Inc. v. Ward 231 P.3d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
Taser International, Inc. v. Ward
231 P.3d 921
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
We assume it considered the evidence, , and deem that the court denied the motion and objections, , (stating that when a court fails to rule on a motion, it is deemed denied).
- Dowling v. Stapley 211 P.3d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- Dowling v. Stapley 211 P.3d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- State v. Speers 98 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
-
State v. Speers
98 P.3d 560
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
“Evidence is collateral if it could not properly be offered for any purpose independent of the contradiction.” , ( , ).
- State v. Armstrong 93 P.3d 1061 Ariz. 2004
- State v. Blackman 38 P.3d 1192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
- State v. Blackman 38 P.3d 1192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
- State v. Fulminante 975 P.2d 75 Ariz. 1999
-
State v. Fulminante
975 P.2d 75
Ariz. 1999
See, , (defendant was with victim and in control of her car immediately prior to murder, withdrew all money from victim’s bank account, and tire tracks at scene were consistent with victim’s car, which defendant was videotaped selling to undercover officer); , (defendant argued with victim two weeks prior, possessed store receipts from where victim shopped, and shoe prints matching defendant’s led from victim’s truck to victim’s home, where defendant was found).
- State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Detrich 932 P.2d 1328 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Detrich 932 P.2d 1328 Ariz. 1997
- State v. McCrimmon 927 P.2d 1298 Ariz. 1996
- State v. McCrimmon 927 P.2d 1298 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
- Guardianship of Monti v. Monti 924 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- Guardianship of Monti v. Monti 924 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
- State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Kemp 912 P.2d 1281 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Kemp 912 P.2d 1281 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Wilson 914 P.2d 1346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
State v. Wilson
914 P.2d 1346
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
The purpose of an investigator is “to call attention to factual matters of which counsel may not be aware.” , 321 n. 3, , 1383 n. 3 (1993) (citing comment to Rule 9.3(d)), cert.
- State v. Gertz 918 P.2d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
State v. Gertz
918 P.2d 1056
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
(“Evidence is collateral if it could not properly be offered for any purpose independent of the contradiction.”); -95 , -91 (App.1988) (upholding exclusion of extrinsic evidence offered to impeach on collateral matter).
- State v. Killean 907 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Killean 907 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
-
State v. Murray
906 P.2d 542
Ariz. 1995
This court dealt with a , , cert.
- State v. Krone 897 P.2d 621 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Krone 897 P.2d 621 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Barr 904 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Barr 904 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Eastlack 883 P.2d 999 Ariz. 1994
-
State v. Eastlack
883 P.2d 999
Ariz. 1994
(“[TJrial judges should discuss all factors considered in mitigation.”)
- State v. Maturana 882 P.2d 933 Ariz. 1994
- State v. Maturana 882 P.2d 933 Ariz. 1994
- State v. Wood 881 P.2d 1158 Ariz. 1994