Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bible, 858 P.2d 1152.

901 citing documents.

State v. Doody 930 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Doody 930 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Error is harmless “if we can say, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the error did not contribute to or affect the verdict.” , cert.
State v. Johnson 922 P.2d 294 Ariz. 1996
State v. Johnson 922 P.2d 294 Ariz. 1996
our previous opinion on this subject.
State v. Miller 921 P.2d 1151 Ariz. 1996
State v. Miller 921 P.2d 1151 Ariz. 1996
State v. Laird 920 P.2d 769 Ariz. 1996
State v. Laird 920 P.2d 769 Ariz. 1996
See, e.g., Jackson, 186 Ariz. at 31-32 , 918 P.2d at 1049-50 (claim that defendant was immature and killed impulsively was refuted by his extensive participation in the crime and the deliberate nature of the murder); , (defendant must show causal connection between the alleged mitigation (difficult family history) and the murder), cert.
State v. Rodriguez 921 P.2d 643 Ariz. 1996
State v. Rodriguez 921 P.2d 643 Ariz. 1996
We have not yet decided whether to adopt the Daubert rule in Arizona, , cert.
State v. Towery 920 P.2d 290 Ariz. 1996
State v. Towery 920 P.2d 290 Ariz. 1996
600 , 1203 (1993), cert.
State v. Miller 928 P.2d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Miller 928 P.2d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Lee 917 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1996
State v. Lee 917 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1996
Defendant argues that the article was “so outrageous that it [turned] the trial into a mockery of justice or a mere formality,” , cert.
State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Paxton 925 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Paxton 925 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
(holding evidence of DNA random match probability statistics inadmissible), cert.
State v. Kemp 912 P.2d 1281 Ariz. 1996
State v. Kemp 912 P.2d 1281 Ariz. 1996
State v. Roscoe 910 P.2d 635 Ariz. 1996
State v. Roscoe 910 P.2d 635 Ariz. 1996
State v. Gertz 918 P.2d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Gertz 918 P.2d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Error is harmless “if we can say, beyond a reasonable doubt, that [it] did not contribute to or affect the verdict.”
State v. Bogan 905 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Bogan 905 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Fullem 912 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Hardwick 905 P.2d 1384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Hardwick 905 P.2d 1384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Fullem 912 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Gulbrandson 906 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1995
State v. Walker 914 P.2d 1320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Gulbrandson 906 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1995
State v. Walker 914 P.2d 1320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Fernane 914 P.2d 1314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
State v. Fernane 914 P.2d 1314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
l evidence,” and considering “the fact-specific nature of the inquiry," we cannot say beyond a reasonable doubt that the erroneous admission of all of the prior bad acts evidence against appellant (particularly as it was utilized and argued by Stern) was harmless or " ‘had no influence on the jury’s judgment.’ ” , ( , ), cert.
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
566 , 1169 (1993), cert.
State v. Walden 905 P.2d 974 Ariz. 1995
State v. Walden 905 P.2d 974 Ariz. 1995
State v. Williams 904 P.2d 437 Ariz. 1995
State v. Williams 904 P.2d 437 Ariz. 1995
521 , 70 L.Ed.2d 391 (1981); , (“Evidence of flight from, or concealment of, a crime usually constitutes an admission by conduct.”), cert.
State v. Boles 905 P.2d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Boles 905 P.2d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Streich, 658 A.2d at 47-48; , cert.
State v. Stokley 898 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1995
State v. Stokley 898 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1995
566 , 1169 (1993), cert.