Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Landrigan, 859 P.2d 111.

123 citing documents.

State v. Lynch 234 P.3d 595 Ariz. 2010
However, Beck “does not require a trial court to instruct on a lesser offense that is unsupported by the evidence.” ¶ 29, ( ).
State v. Yegan 221 P.3d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Yegan 221 P.3d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Substantial evidence is defined as “such proof that reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” , (citations omitted).
State v. Tillmon 216 P.3d 1198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Tillmon 216 P.3d 1198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State of Arizona v. Javier Fimbres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State of Arizona v. Javier Fimbres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
“Evidence may be direct or circumstantial, but if reasonable minds can differ on inferences to be drawn therefrom, the case must be submitted to the jury.” (citation omitted).
State v. Bearup 211 P.3d 684 Ariz. 2009
State v. Bearup 211 P.3d 684 Ariz. 2009
- 12 - ¶29 “Beck[, however,] does not require a trial court to instruct on a lesser offense that is unsupported by the evidence.”
State v. Jernigan 209 P.3d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Jernigan 209 P.3d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Cifelli 155 P.3d 363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Cifelli 155 P.3d 363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Stroud 88 P.3d 190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Stroud 88 P.3d 190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Davolt 84 P.3d 456 Ariz. 2004
State v. Davolt 84 P.3d 456 Ariz. 2004
See Schad v. Arizona, 501 U.S. 624, 648 (1991)
Chartone, Inc. v. Mercaldo, Ltd. Webb, Pc. Durazzo & Eckel Smart Professional Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Sullivan 69 P.3d 1006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Sullivan 69 P.3d 1006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State of Arizona v. Tyrone Vaughn Henry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Tyrone Vaughn Henry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State v. Booker 53 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Booker 53 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Sansing 26 P.3d 1118 Ariz. 2001
State v. Sansing 26 P.3d 1118 Ariz. 2001
3047 , 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990); , see also Clark v. Ricketts, 958 F.2d 851, 859 (9th Cir.1992).
State v. Van Adams 984 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1999
State v. Van Adams 984 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1999
(“Beck does not require a trial court to instruct on a lesser offense that is unsupported by the evidence.”).
State v. Medina 975 P.2d 94 Ariz. 1999
State v. Fontes 986 P.2d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
State v. Fontes 986 P.2d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
State v. Greene 967 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1998
State v. Greene 967 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1998
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
State v. Brown 936 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
State v. Brown 936 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
State v. Lacy 929 P.2d 1288 Ariz. 1996
State v. Lacy 929 P.2d 1288 Ariz. 1996
State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
State v. Towery 920 P.2d 290 Ariz. 1996
State v. Towery 920 P.2d 290 Ariz. 1996
The equal protection clause requires sentencing by a , , cert.
State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
State v. Jackson 918 P.2d 1038 Ariz. 1996
State v. Jackson 918 P.2d 1038 Ariz. 1996
State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996