Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Spencer, 859 P.2d 146.
- State of Arizona v. Dwandarrius Jamar Robinson 509 P.3d 1023 Ariz. 2022
-
State of Arizona v. Dwandarrius Jamar Robinson
509 P.3d 1023
Ariz. 2022
(dousing victim with accelerant and setting her on fire after raping and stabbing her was needless mutilation).
- State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
State v. Wright
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“Rule 403 weighing is best left to the trial court and, absent an abuse of discretion, will not be disturbed on appeal.”
- State v. Hon. padilla/colvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
State v. Hon. padilla/colvin
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(“Rule 403 weighing is best left to the trial court.”) ().
- State v. Youngs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Youngs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Id.; (stating that this court reviews for an abuse of discretion a trial court’s decision to admit evidence challenged under Rule 403).
- State v. Carreon 107 P.3d 900 Ariz. 2005
- State v. Carreon 107 P.3d 900 Ariz. 2005
- State v. Murdaugh 97 P.3d 844 Ariz. 2004
-
State v. Murdaugh
97 P.3d 844
Ariz. 2004
And, “[mutilation] alone supports the finding of heinousness or depravity.”
- State v. Bass 31 P.3d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
- State v. Bass 31 P.3d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
- State v. Pandeli 26 P.3d 1136 Ariz. 2001
- State v. Pandeli 26 P.3d 1136 Ariz. 2001
- State v. Harrod 26 P.3d 492 Ariz. 2001
-
State v. Harrod
26 P.3d 492
Ariz. 2001
a. Pecuniary Gain ¶ 47 The state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that receiving something of value was “a motive, cause or impetus [for the murder] and not merely the result.”
- State v. Ring 25 P.3d 1139 Ariz. 2001
-
State v. Ring
25 P.3d 1139
Ariz. 2001
at 514 ¶ 41, 975 P.2d at 104 ¶ 41 (relishing, gratuitous violence, and helplessness); , (helplessness and gratuitous violence); , (helplessness and relishing); , (helplessness and relishing); , (needless mutilation of victim); , (relishing, gratuitous violence, and helplessness); , (gratuitous violence and helplessness).
- State v. Jones 4 P.3d 345 Ariz. 2000
-
State v. Jones
4 P.3d 345
Ariz. 2000
¶ 55 , we rejected this argument and held that if the receipt or expectation of pecuniary value is a cause of, or a motive for the murder, the F.5 factor applies.
- State v. Kayer 984 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1999
-
State v. Kayer
984 P.2d 31
Ariz. 1999
(noting that pecuniary gain does not exist in every case where “a person has been killed and at the same time defendant has made a financial gain”).
- State v. Medina 975 P.2d 94 Ariz. 1999
- State v. Fulminante 975 P.2d 75 Ariz. 1999
-
State v. Fulminante
975 P.2d 75
Ariz. 1999
See, , (defendant was with victim and in control of her car immediately prior to murder, withdrew all money from victim’s bank account, and tire tracks at scene were consistent with victim’s car, which defendant was videotaped selling to undercover officer)
- State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
-
State v. Trostle
951 P.2d 869
Ariz. 1997
In dismissing defendant’s trial behavior, the judge correctly observed that such conduct “is the norm and is expected.” , (good trial behavior says nothing about defendant’s character, tendencies, or rehabilitative potential).
- State v. Soto-Fong 928 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1996
-
State v. Soto-Fong
928 P.2d 610
Ariz. 1996
E. Behavior at Trial The trial court correctly recognized that Fong’s behavior at trial was not relevant to mitigation because it “says nothing about his character, tendencies, or rehabilitative potential.”
- State v. Schwartz 935 P.2d 891 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- State v. Schwartz 935 P.2d 891 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Laird 920 P.2d 769 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Laird 920 P.2d 769 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Lee 917 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1996
-
State v. Lee
917 P.2d 692
Ariz. 1996
435 , 130 L.Ed.2d 347 (1994); , cert.
- State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Miles 918 P.2d 1028 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Jackson 918 P.2d 1038 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Jackson 918 P.2d 1038 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Miles 918 P.2d 1028 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Kemp 912 P.2d 1281 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Kemp 912 P.2d 1281 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996