Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Lara, 830 P.2d 803.
- State v. Garcia 860 P.2d 498 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
-
Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
847 P.2d 595
Ariz. 1993
In light of our “healthy respect for stare decisis,’’ , we do not lightly overrule precedent and do so only for compelling reasons, see
- State v. Snead 854 P.2d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-
State v. Snead
854 P.2d 1183
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
that the use of a weapon may be used to increase the charge 2 , to enhance the sentence under A.R.S.
- State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
-
State v. Salazar
844 P.2d 566
Ariz. 1992
In fact, , the court reluctantly followed a line of cases involving statutory construction, while recognizing that the court, as presently constituted, would probably have reached a different result if it were writing on a clean slate.
- State v. Conde 846 P.2d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
State v. Conde
846 P.2d 843
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Lara has been reversed by our supreme court, , which we must follow regardless of our own analysis.