Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Scott, 865 P.2d 792.

106 citing documents.

State v. Soriano-Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Soriano-Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Varela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Varela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Lucero 220 P.3d 249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Lucero 220 P.3d 249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Fischer 199 P.3d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
State v. Fischer 199 P.3d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
State v. Sharma 165 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Sharma 165 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Conn 98 P.3d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Conn 98 P.3d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
2348 ; , ( , ) (Arizona has history of not requiring “that a defendant be advised in the indictment or information of the statutory penalty”).
State v. Carlson 48 P.3d 1180 Ariz. 2002
State v. Carlson 48 P.3d 1180 Ariz. 2002
State v. Cañez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
State v. Canez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
State v. Cañez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
-53 , -13 (1993), , 63-64 n. 7, , 1011-12 n. 7 ¶¶ 28-30 (1998); -16 , -61 (1983); State v. Ortiz, 131 Ariz.
State v. Canez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
-53, -13 (1993), - 64 n.7, -12 n.7 ¶¶28-30 (1998); -16, -61 (1983)
State v. Estrada 18 P.3d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Estrada 18 P.3d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
¶ 5 Petitioner’s , , which address the due process requirement that the state give sufficient advance notice of the aggravating factors it intends to prove at sentencing to enable a defendant to prepare a rebuttal, is misplaced.
State v. Anderson 4 P.3d 369 Ariz. 2000
State v. Anderson 4 P.3d 369 Ariz. 2000
(failure to ask for food, *327 medication or sleep, coupled with a lack of evidence that any request would not be granted, satisfies the State’s burden to establish the voluntariness of a confession).
State v. Hurley 4 P.3d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Hurley 4 P.3d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
-40 , -01 (1993) (citations omitted).
State v. Smith 974 P.2d 431 Ariz. 1999
State v. Smith 974 P.2d 431 Ariz. 1999
State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
See, , (one or two unnecessary gunshot wounds, either of which may have been fatal, do not establish gratuitous violence).
State v. Cisneroz 947 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
State v. Cisneroz 947 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
State v. Lacy 929 P.2d 1288 Ariz. 1996
State v. Lacy 929 P.2d 1288 Ariz. 1996
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Delinquency Action No. 12744101 927 P.2d 366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Delinquency Action No. 12744101 927 P.2d 366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
“[T]o constitute a lesser included offense, it must be impossible to have committed the greater offense without necessarily having committed the lesser offense.” , cert.
State v. Miller 921 P.2d 1151 Ariz. 1996
State v. Miller 921 P.2d 1151 Ariz. 1996
State v. Gallegos 916 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1996
State v. Gallegos 916 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1996
State v. Jansing 918 P.2d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Jansing 918 P.2d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Kemp 912 P.2d 1281 Ariz. 1996
State v. Kemp 912 P.2d 1281 Ariz. 1996
State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996
State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996
State v. Kamai 911 P.2d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Kamai 911 P.2d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Williams 904 P.2d 437 Ariz. 1995
State v. Williams 904 P.2d 437 Ariz. 1995