Cited by

¶26 “The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and federal constitutions is fundamental fairness.” (holding it constitutionally unfair for the State to provide a prisoner the right to legal representation and then call that counsel to testify against the prisoner regarding said legal representation).

is fundamental fairness.’” ¶ 66 (App. 1999) ().

“The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and federal constitutions is fundamental fairness.” Jeff D. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 7 (App. 2016) ().

(“Due process requires that a criminal defendant receive a fundamentally fair trial.”); (“The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and federal constitutions is fundamental fairness.”).

California v. Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479, 485 (1984) (“Under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, criminal prosecutions must comport with prevailing notions of fundamental fairness.”); (“The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and federal constitutions is fundamental fairness.”).

¶6 “The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and federal constitutions is fundamental fairness.”

¶29 “The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and federal constitutions is fundamental fairness.” Jeff D., 239 Ariz. at 207, ¶ 7 ().

(“[I]f an accused is to derive the full benefits of his right to counsel, he must have the assurance of confidentiality and privacy of communication with his attorney.”); (finding it would violate a defendant’s due process rights to permit testimony from his inmate representative even 3 CLEMENTS v. HON.

¶17 “The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and federal constitutions is fundamental fairness.”

(“The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and federal constitutions is fundamental fairness.”).

(“The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and federal constitutions is fundamental fairness.”).

7 ¶10 “The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and federal constitutions is fundamental fairness,” whereas “[p]rocedural due process guarantees that permissible governmental interference is fairly achieved.”

In Arizona, due process requires fundamental fairness, which in turn requires that criminal defendants be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense, 2 For the same reason, we reject Sarullo’s argument that the only victim of a burglary is the person against whom the theft or felony was intended to be

in severance proceedings, as in criminal cases, the “ultimate focus of inquiry must be on the fundamental fairness of the proceeding whose result is being challenged.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 696, 104 S. Ct. at 2069; see also Lassiter, 452 U.S. at 24-25, 101 S. Ct. at 2158 (due process resists precise definition but “expresses the requirement of ‘fundamental fairness’”); (“The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and federal constitutions is fundamental fairness.”).

¶13 “The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and federal constitutions is fundamental fairness.”

XIV, § 1; Ariz. Const. art. II, § 4; (“The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and federal constitutions is fundamental fairness.”).

Relying on the Arizona Supreme Court’s , defendant moved to suppress all oral and written statements he made to D’Martini, arguing that admission of the statements at his trial would violate his right to due process under both the United States and Arizona constitutions.

“The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and fed-' eral constitutions is fundamental fairness.” *314

“The touchstone of due process under both the Arizona and federal constitutions is fundamental fairness.” State v. *508 Melendez