Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gallegos, 870 P.2d 1097.

199 citing documents.

State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
We consider the jury instructions “in their entirety when determining whether they adequately reflect the law.”
State v. Peterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Peterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
If a party does not make a proper objection, appellate review may be limited.”); (“[A] trial judge’s failure to give an instruction sua sponte provides grounds for reversal only if such failure is fundamental error.”).
Ratliff v. Vanig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Ratliff v. Vanig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Schaeffer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Schaeffer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
If a party does not make a proper objection, appellate review may be limited.”); (“[A] trial judge’s failure to give an instruction sua sponte provides grounds for reversal only if such failure is fundamental error.”).
State v. Espizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Espizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Jones 559 P.3d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Jones 559 P.3d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
If a party does not make a proper objection, appellate review may be limited.”); (“Absent a finding of fundamental error, failure to raise an issue at trial, including failure to request a jury instruction, waives the right to raise the issue on appeal.”); (“[A] trial judge’s failure to give an instruction sua sponte provides grounds for reversal only if such failure is fundamental error.”); ¶¶ 36–37 (2018) (rejecting State’s argument “that when a failure to object could have been strategic, it
State v. Brown 556 P.3d 776 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Brown 556 P.3d 776 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
[jury] instruction was not improper”); (Stating, without citing Gendron, that “a trial judge’s failure to give an instruction sua sponte provides grounds for reversal only if such failure is fundamental error.”) (citation omitted).
State of Arizona v. Preston Alton Strong 555 P.3d 537 Ariz. 2024
State of Arizona v. Preston Alton Strong 555 P.3d 537 Ariz. 2024
State v. McKinley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. McKinley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 22 (2009); (“[A] trial judge’s failure to give an instruction sua sponte provides grounds for reversal only if such failure is fundamental error.”).
State v. Sulu-Kerr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Sulu-Kerr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
If a party does not make a proper objection, appellate review may be limited”); (“[A] trial judge’s failure to give an instruction sua sponte provides grounds for reversal only if such failure is fundamental error.”).
State v. Hon. Whitehead Gallegos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Hon. Whitehead Gallegos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Gallegos (Gallegos I)
State v. Rix 536 P.3d 253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Rix 536 P.3d 253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Difilippantonio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Difilippantonio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Herndon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Herndon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
“Mere speculation that the jury was confused is insufficient to establish actual jury confusion.”
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Wayne Thompson II 502 P.3d 437 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Wayne Thompson II 502 P.3d 437 Ariz. 2022
State v. Kogan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Kogan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
(holding erroneous exclusion of evidence harmless because it was “merely cumulative” to other evidence presented).
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Riepe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Riepe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State of Arizona v. John Michael Allen Ariz. 2020
State of Arizona v. John Michael Allen Ariz. 2020
See Bass, 198 Ariz. at 577 ¶ 17 (“[M]ere speculation that the jury was confused is insufficient to establish actual jury confusion.” ().
State v. Brock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Brock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Taft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Taft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
("Mere speculation that the jury was confused is insufficient to establish actual jury confusion."); ¶ 18 (1998) (holding when a defendant "merely speculates" that the jury considered an impermissible matter, the court will not "indulge such guesswork.").
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
(quotation omitted); (noting where jury instructions “are ‘substantially free from error,’ the defendant suffers no prejudice by their wording.”) ().
State v. Naranjo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Naranjo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Byers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Byers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Error is harmless if the State demonstrates "beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to or affect the verdict," ¶ 18 (2005), and when excluded evidence is merely cumulative to admitted evidence
State v. Dustin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dustin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019