Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gulbrandson, 906 P.2d 579.

249 citing documents.

State v. Clabourne 983 P.2d 748 Ariz. 1999
See State v. Mann, 188 * -67 , -600 (1995).
State v. Van Adams 984 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1999
State v. White 982 P.2d 819 Ariz. 1999
State v. White 982 P.2d 819 Ariz. 1999
§ 13-703, which prescribes the death penalty, is not cruel and unusual on its face, West, 176 Ariz. at 455 , 862 P.2d at 215 ; (6) that requiring appellant to choose between gas and injection is not cruel and unusual, Poland v. Stewart, 117 F.3d 1094, 1105 (9th Cir.1997); (7) that the statute does not mandate the death sentence upon finding one aggravator, , (8) that defendant may not death-qualify the sentencing court, , (9) that the statute provides sufficient guidance in balancing the factors
State v. Mills 995 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Mills 995 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Soto 990 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Soto 990 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
When law-enforcement officers make an initial warrantless entry, “ ‘products of a subsequent search [pursuant to a warrant] may be admitted at trial, provided the warrant was based on information legally obtained.’ ” , cert.
State v. Sharp 973 P.2d 1171 Ariz. 1999
State v. Sharp 973 P.2d 1171 Ariz. 1999
State v. Doerr 969 P.2d 1168 Ariz. 1998
State v. Doerr 969 P.2d 1168 Ariz. 1998
State v. Greene 967 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1998
State v. Dominguez 967 P.2d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Dominguez 967 P.2d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
However, , our supreme court held that the trial court was not required to obtain such a waiver, at least in the absence of an indication at trial that defendant wished to testify.
State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
State v. Rienhardt 951 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1997
State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
State v. Rienhardt 951 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1997
State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
1832 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1038 (1997); , cert, denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct.
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
have the tendency to incite passion or inflame the jury, “the court must go beyond the question of relevancy and consider whether the probative value of the exhibit outweighs the danger of prejudice created by admission of the exhibit.” Bolton, 182 Ariz. at 305 , 896 P.2d at 845 (citations omitted); see also State v. Jones, *615 , , cert, denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct.
State v. Terrazas 944 P.2d 1194 Ariz. 1997
State v. Terrazas 944 P.2d 1194 Ariz. 1997
cert, denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct.
Sherrill v. City of Peoria 943 P.2d 1215 Ariz. 1997
Sherrill v. City of Peoria 943 P.2d 1215 Ariz. 1997
v. Foothills Area Coalition, , ).
State v. Weinstein 947 P.2d 880 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
State v. Weinstein 947 P.2d 880 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
When police make an initial warrant-less entry, “ ‘[t]he products of a subsequent search under warrant may be admitted at trial, provided the warrant was based on information legally obtained.’ ”
State v. Mann 934 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1997
State v. Mann 934 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1997
Spears, 184 Ariz. at 292, 908 P.2d at 1077 ; Roscoe, 184 Ariz. at 502 , 910 P.2d at 653
State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
cert denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct.
State v. Miller 921 P.2d 1151 Ariz. 1996
State v. Miller 921 P.2d 1151 Ariz. 1996
(“In weighing, we do not simply count the number of aggravating or mitigating factors.
State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
State v. Gallegos 916 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1996
State v. Gallegos 916 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1996
State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Roscoe 910 P.2d 635 Ariz. 1996
State v. Roscoe 910 P.2d 635 Ariz. 1996
Walton, 159 Ariz. at 584 , 769 P.2d at 1030 .