DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Williams, 904 P.2d 437.

90 citing documents.

  • State v. Prion 52 P.3d 189 Ariz. 2002
  • State v. Prion 52 P.3d 189 Ariz. 2002
    -77, -46 (1995) (murder of first victim consolidated with armed robbery and attempted murder of second victim where attempted murder occurred after the murder, and by the defendant’s own statements was to silence a witness who he believed had implicated him in the
  • State v. Pandeli 26 P.3d 1136 Ariz. 2001
  • State v. Pandeli 26 P.3d 1136 Ariz. 2001
  • State v. Sansing 26 P.3d 1118 Ariz. 2001
  • State v. Sansing 26 P.3d 1118 Ariz. 2001
  • State v. Mills 995 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
  • State v. Mills 995 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
    Gulbrandson (motive and intent); , (motive).
  • State v. Greene 967 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1998
  • State v. Greene 967 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1998
    Although past good conduct and character is a relevant mitigating circumstance, , a single good deed, removed in time from the crime, does not rise to that level and is not mitigating.
  • State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Rienhardt 951 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Rienhardt 951 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
    1444 , 134 L.Ed.2d 564 (1996); -83 , -52 (1995) (“[V]alidity of the trial court’s (F)(2) finding is unaffected by the fact that the convictions were simultaneous or by the fact that the armed robbery occurred after the murder.”).
  • State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
    1444 , 134 L.Ed.2d 564 (1996); -83 , -52 (1995).
  • State v. Terrazas 944 P.2d 1194 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Terrazas 944 P.2d 1194 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Lemming 937 P.2d 381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • State v. Medina 949 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • State v. Medina 949 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
    (“Moreover, even in cases where an accused experiences some prejudice from a lapse of time, prosecutions fol *422 lowing investigative delays do not necessarily offend due process.”); , -98 , -87 (1988); -93 , -02 (1981).
  • State v. Lemming 937 P.2d 381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
    (“Moreover, even in cases where an accused experiences some prejudice from a lapse of time, prosecutions following investigative delays do not necessarily offend due process.”); , -98 , -87 (1988); -93 , -02 (1981).
  • State v. Hughes 938 P.2d 457 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Hughes 938 P.2d 457 Ariz. 1997
    (attempted murder of a witness admissible to explain another’s initial refusal to tell the truth about charged crime); , (assaults on others admissible to explain witness’s fear of defendant and reason for delayed reporting
  • State v. Mann 934 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Mann 934 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1997
    when the judge might have believed that a request for leniency was relevant.
  • State v. Everidge 932 P.2d 802 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
  • State v. Everidge 932 P.2d 802 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
  • State v. Lacy 929 P.2d 1288 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Lacy 929 P.2d 1288 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Dunlap 930 P.2d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Dunlap 930 P.2d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
    455 , *450 459-61, 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)
  • State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
    (victim’s sister’s recommendation of life sentence not relevant mitigating circumstance because recommendation was out of concern for defendant’s family and was unrelated to defendant); , cert.
  • State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Roscoe 910 P.2d 635 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Roscoe 910 P.2d 635 Ariz. 1996
    (citing Bolton, 182 Ariz. at 315 , 896 P.2d at 855 ).