Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Spears, 908 P.2d 1062.
- State v. Smith 974 P.2d 431 Ariz. 1999
-
State v. Smith
974 P.2d 431
Ariz. 1999
This factor exists when pecuniary gain is “a motive, cause or impetus for the murder and not merely the result of the murder.” , , cert.
- State v. Doerr 969 P.2d 1168 Ariz. 1998
- State v. Doerr 969 P.2d 1168 Ariz. 1998
- State v. Greene 967 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1998
-
State v. Greene
967 P.2d 106
Ariz. 1998
1826 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1033 (1997), and refused to find mitigation where the defendant was unable to hold down a job for any significant period and was frequently unemployed
- State v. Bentlage 961 P.2d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
- State v. Bentlage 961 P.2d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
- State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
-
State v. Trostle
951 P.2d 869
Ariz. 1997
See, , (finding no prejudice, in part, because record did not show whether jurors were exposed to extraneous information).
- State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
-
State v. Lee
944 P.2d 1204
Ariz. 1997
cert, denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct.
- State v. Terrazas 944 P.2d 1194 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Mann 934 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Mann 934 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Tinajero 935 P.2d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- State v. Tinajero 935 P.2d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- State v. Soto-Fong 928 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1996
-
State v. Soto-Fong
928 P.2d 610
Ariz. 1996
However, “[t]he trial court may not find pecuniary gain in every case in which ‘a person has been killed and at the same time defendant has made a financial gain.’ ” , ( , ).
- State v. Miller 921 P.2d 1151 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Miller 921 P.2d 1151 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
- State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
-
State v. McKinney
917 P.2d 1214
Ariz. 1996
(affirming death sentence where pecuniary gain was only aggravator, and military service and lack of significant prior criminal record were only mitigators).
- State v. Jackson 918 P.2d 1038 Ariz. 1996
-
State v. Jackson
918 P.2d 1038
Ariz. 1996
(trial court disclosed jury foreperson’s letter alleging juror misconduct); , , 1384 (1995) (trial court improperly failed to disclose jury’s inconsistent verdicts).