DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Jones, 917 P.2d 200.

123 citing documents.

  • State v. Fontes 986 P.2d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
  • State v. Doerr 969 P.2d 1168 Ariz. 1998
  • State v. Doerr 969 P.2d 1168 Ariz. 1998
    We have found gratuitous violence where the victim suffered a large number of stab wounds and a contact gunshot wound to the head, Amaya-Ruiz, 166 Ariz. at 178 , 800 P.2d at 1286 ; a stabbing in'the throat following a shooting, , two blows to the head with a bat followed by smothering and strangulation, -89 , -18 (1996); numerous gunshot wounds to the head from different weapons, , continued bludgeoning with a tire jack, , and bruises, scraping or cutting injuries, a wound to
  • State v. Greene 967 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1998
  • State v. Greene 967 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1998
    ¶ 48 , this court gave “some weight” to evidence of that defendant’s history of alcoholism and drug abuse, and his own statement that on the night of the murder he had not slept for three or four days and was under the influence of methamphetamine and alcohol.
  • State v. Djerf 959 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1998
  • State v. Djerf 959 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1998
  • State v. Bentlage 961 P.2d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
  • State v. Bentlage 961 P.2d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
    effects sought to be inspected.’” , quoting United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 171 , 94 S.Ct.
  • State v. Alatorre 953 P.2d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. Alatorre 953 P.2d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. Rienhardt 951 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Rienhardt 951 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1997
    1088 , 137 L.Ed.2d 221 (1997)
  • State v. Shone 945 P.2d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • State v. Shone 945 P.2d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
    When the photographs, however, have the tendency to incite passion or inflame the jury, “the court must go beyond the question of relevancy and consider whether the probative value of the exhibit outweighs the danger of prejudice created by admission of the exhibit.” Bolton, 182 Ariz. at 305 , 896 P.2d at 845 (citations omitted); see also State v. Jones, *615 , , cert, denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct.
  • State v. Detrich 932 P.2d 1328 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Detrich 932 P.2d 1328 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Lacy 929 P.2d 1288 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Lacy 929 P.2d 1288 Ariz. 1996