DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. LeBlanc, 924 P.2d 441.

131 citing documents.

  • State v. Prince 61 P.3d 450 Ariz. 2003
  • State v. Prince 61 P.3d 450 Ariz. 2003
    (“[Ejxperience teaches us that [jurors] possess both common sense and a strong desire to properly perform their duties.”).
  • State v. Rosas-Hernandez 42 P.3d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
  • State v. Rosas-Hernandez 42 P.3d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
  • State v. Blackman 38 P.3d 1192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
  • State v. Blackman 38 P.3d 1192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
  • Gusler v. Wilkinson 18 P.3d 702 Ariz. 2001
  • Gusler v. Wilkinson 18 P.3d 702 Ariz. 2001
    A jury may “render a verdict on a lesser-included offense if, after full and careful consideration of the evidence, they are unable to reach agreement with respect to the charged crime.”
  • State v. Hoskins 14 P.3d 997 Ariz. 2000
  • State v. Canion 16 P.3d 788 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • State v. Canion 16 P.3d 788 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • State v. Morales 10 P.3d 630 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
  • State v. Morales 10 P.3d 630 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
    (“For too long, we have treated jurors like untrustworthy children instead of responsible adults, insulting their individual and collective intelligence by attempting to micromanage then-discussions and deliberations.”).
  • State v. Rodriguez 7 P.3d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
  • State v. Rodriguez 7 P.3d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
    The court also instructed the jury, , that it must use reasonable efforts to reach a verdict on the greater charge before considering the lesser.
  • State v. Martinez 999 P.2d 795 Ariz. 2000
  • State v. Martinez 999 P.2d 795 Ariz. 2000
    where we abandoned the “acquittal first” procedure for lesser-included offenses in favor of the “reasonable efforts” procedure.
  • State v. Cordova 8 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
  • State v. Cordova 8 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
    C. Lesser-included Instructions ¶ 10 Cordova also challenges the trial court’s instructions on lesser-included offenses, contending they did not contain the “reasonable efforts”
  • State v. Harrison 985 P.2d 486 Ariz. 1999
  • State v. Harrison 985 P.2d 486 Ariz. 1999
    See, -40 , -44 (1996) (applying reasonable efforts instruction in place of Wussler rule prospectively only); -91 , -77 (1982) (applying inadmissibility of post-hypnosis testimony prospectively only).
  • State v. Harvey 974 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. Harvey 974 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
    As we discuss below, , that lesser included homicide crimes could be considered if there were an acquittal or lack of agreement on the murder charge.
  • State v. Tankersley 956 P.2d 486 Ariz. 1998
  • State v. Tankersley 956 P.2d 486 Ariz. 1998
  • State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Rogovich 932 P.2d 794 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Rogovich 932 P.2d 794 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Solano 930 P.2d 1315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Solano 930 P.2d 1315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996