Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gonzalez-Gutierrez, 927 P.2d 776.
- State v. Gutierrez 381 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- State v. Gutierrez 381 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- State v. Parker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
State v. Parker
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See State v. Gonzalez–Gutierrez
- State v. Meza-Contreras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
State v. Meza-Contreras
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶10 “An investigatory stop of a motor vehicle constitutes a seizure under the Fourth Amendment.”
- State of Arizona v. Nicholas Olaf Kjolsrud, Loni Kay Kambitsch 371 P.3d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- State of Arizona v. Nicholas Olaf Kjolsrud, Loni Kay Kambitsch 371 P.3d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- State v. Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
State v. Carrillo
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Gonzalez–Gutierrez
- State v. Nash Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Nash
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Under this standard, the officer must possess ’a particularized and objective basis’ for suspecting that the particular person stopped had committed such acts.” Moran, 232 Ariz. at 531, ¶ 4, citing State v. Gonzalez–Gutierrez
- State v. Vincent Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Vincent Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Evans 349 P.3d 205 Ariz. 2015
- State of Arizona v. Dale Lee Evans Ariz. 2015
- State of Arizona v. Dale Lee Evans Ariz. 2015
- State v. Evans 349 P.3d 205 Ariz. 2015
- State v. Krauch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Krauch
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gonzalez–Gutierrez
- State v. Hon. hancock/jennifer Ferrell 347 P.3d 142 Ariz. 2015
- State v. Hon. hancock/jennifer Ferrell 347 P.3d 142 Ariz. 2015
- State v. Sandoval Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Sandoval
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gonzalez–Gutierrez
- State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Chavez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gonzalez–Gutierrez
- State of Arizona v. Jesus Ramiro Moreno 340 P.3d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
-
State of Arizona v. Jesus Ramiro Moreno
340 P.3d 426
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
(totality of circumstances analysis includes “evaluat[ing] subjective 6To the contrary, Fourth Amendment jurisprudence allows officer leeway in the other direction.
- Kpnx v. Hon. stephens/state 340 P.3d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Kpnx v. Hon. stephens/state 340 P.3d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Steve Gallardo v. State of Arizona 336 P.3d 717 Ariz. 2014
- Steve Gallardo v. State of Arizona 336 P.3d 717 Ariz. 2014
- State of Arizona v. David J. Waller 333 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
-
State of Arizona v. David J. Waller
333 P.3d 806
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
In our review, we look only to the evidence presented at the suppression hearing and view it in the light most favorable to sustaining the court’s ruling, deferring to the court’s determination of facts and witness credibility but reviewing de novo its legal conclusions
- State of Arizona v. Dale Lee Evans 332 P.3d 61 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
-
State of Arizona v. Dale Lee Evans
332 P.3d 61
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
We “give deference to the trial court’s factual findings, including findings regarding [an officer’s] credibility and the reasonableness of inferences that he drew, but we review de novo the trial court’s ultimate legal determination.”
- State of Arizona v. Esgardo Javier Nevarez 329 P.3d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State of Arizona v. Esgardo Javier Nevarez 329 P.3d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State v. Curtis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Curtis
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Gonzalez– Gutierrez
- State of Arizona v. Heulon Colston Brown 310 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-
State of Arizona v. Heulon Colston Brown
310 P.3d 29
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
In our review, we look only to the evidence presented at the suppression hearing and view it in the light most favorable to sustaining the court’s ruling, deferring to the court’s determination of facts and witness credibility but reviewing de novo its legal conclusions
- State of Arizona v. William Peter Moran 307 P.3d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. William Peter Moran 307 P.3d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. Hon. butler/tyler B. 302 P.3d 609 Ariz. 2013
- State v. Mendoza-Ruiz 240 P.3d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- State v. Mendoza-Ruiz 240 P.3d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- State v. Sweeney 227 P.3d 868 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010